From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Riemer Subject: Re: "Virtual" ibnetdiscover command fails Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 11:40:43 +0100 Message-ID: <5112332B.6090200@profitbricks.com> References: <201302052134.17622.jackm@dev.mellanox.co.il> <511220EA.4020607@mellanox.com> <51122E7D.3030607@mellanox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <51122E7D.3030607-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Or Gerlitz Cc: Mathis GAVILLON , Jack Morgenstein , "linux-rdma (linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org)" List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 06.02.2013 11:20, Or Gerlitz wrote: > On 06/02/2013 12:04, Mathis GAVILLON wrote: >> Just a last question : is that possible VFs lid to be different from >> PF one ? > > NO, we've implemented a "shared port" model, so all functions on the > same IB port use the same lid, each function has its own > virtual GUID though. So if I don't use the unmaintained srptools to get the SRP connection strings but instead send them directly to the initiator to connect to the SRP target, then also SRP should be possible with the virtual GUID. Am I right? Cheers, Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html