From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sylwester Nawrocki Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: moving dt binding documents for video devices to common place Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 15:50:15 +0100 Message-ID: <51126DA7.2040309@samsung.com> References: <1360162668-29677-1-git-send-email-rahul.sharma@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailout2.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.12]:33406 "EHLO mailout2.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754590Ab3BFOuS (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Feb 2013 09:50:18 -0500 Received: from eucpsbgm2.samsung.com (unknown [203.254.199.245]) by mailout2.w1.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01(7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Nov 17 2011)) with ESMTP id <0MHS009G1ZTAD070@mailout2.w1.samsung.com> for linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 14:50:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [106.116.147.32] by eusync4.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01(7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Nov 17 2011)) with ESMTPA id <0MHS00CHVZVSFQA0@eusync4.samsung.com> for linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 14:50:16 +0000 (GMT) In-reply-to: <1360162668-29677-1-git-send-email-rahul.sharma@samsung.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Rahul Sharma Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, kgene.kim@samsung.com, sw0312.kim@samsung.com, inki.dae@samsung.com, joshi@samsung.com, r.sh.open@gmail.com Hi Rahul, On 02/06/2013 03:57 PM, Rahul Sharma wrote: > Binding Documents for drm-devices are placed in > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/drm/*. But these devices are common > for v4l framework, hence moved to a common place > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/. 'exynos_' prefix is added to > associate them with exynos soc series. It looks good to me, I would just use 'exynos-' prefix instead, this seems to be more common across existing files. Sorry for the nitpicking.. I suppose you should address the patch to and base on the tree of the device tree maintainers. Thanks, Sylwester