All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Holler <holler@ahsoftware.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: MODSIGN without RTC?
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 00:42:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5112EA69.6010100@ahsoftware.de> (raw)

Hello,

I wanted to try out MODSIGN with kernel 3.7.6 and I've just got hit by:

[    1.346445] X.509: Cert 6a23533cec71c4c52a1618fb4d830e06aa90474e is 
not yet valid

The reason is likely that the (ARM) device in question doesn't have a 
RTC (oh, that topic again ;) ) and gets it's time on boot through NTP.

The used certificate was generated automatically. Having a look at it, 
the following is shown:

        Validity
             Not Before: Feb  6 02:56:46 2013 GMT
             Not After : Jan 13 02:56:46 2113 GMT

Without having thought about possible security problems, my first idea 
would be to let the validity start at 1970. As I never did such I never 
had thought about possible implications when doing such (e.g. I don't 
know if someone checks the start date for plausabilitiy)

Another solution would be to retry loading of the certificate if the 
time gets set (and e.g. differs more than a year).

Has someone already thought about how to solve that problem? Or did 
everyone use sane systems which have a (working) RTC?

Regards,

Alexander

             reply	other threads:[~2013-02-06 23:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-06 23:42 Alexander Holler [this message]
2013-02-07  1:06 ` MODSIGN without RTC? Alexander Holler
2013-02-07  6:42   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-02-07  7:01     ` Alexander Holler
2013-02-07 10:54       ` Alexander Holler
2013-02-13  9:30       ` Alexander Holler
2013-02-07 18:44   ` Olaf Titz
2013-02-11 19:44     ` Alexander Holler
2013-02-12 13:00       ` Alexander Holler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5112EA69.6010100@ahsoftware.de \
    --to=holler@ahsoftware.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.