From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jiri Slaby Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/23] tty: Add diagnostic for halted line discipline Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 16:55:46 +0100 Message-ID: <5113CE82.5070609@suse.cz> References: <1355509370-5883-1-git-send-email-peter@hurleysoftware.com> <1360095638-6624-1-git-send-email-peter@hurleysoftware.com> <1360095638-6624-2-git-send-email-peter@hurleysoftware.com> <5113BF3B.3060307@suse.cz> <1360252434.4102.37.camel@thor.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-ee0-f50.google.com ([74.125.83.50]:61884 "EHLO mail-ee0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757549Ab3BGPzv (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Feb 2013 10:55:51 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1360252434.4102.37.camel@thor.lan> Sender: linux-serial-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Hurley Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Alan Cox , Sasha Levin , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ilya Zykov , Dave Jones On 02/07/2013 04:53 PM, Peter Hurley wrote: >>> +static int tty_ldisc_halt(struct tty_struct *tty) >>> +{ >>> + int scheduled; >>> + clear_bit(TTY_LDISC, &tty->flags); >>> + scheduled = cancel_work_sync(&tty->port->buf.work); >>> + set_bit(TTY_LDISC_HALTED, &tty->flags); >>> + return scheduled; >>> +} >> >> Why did you move with that function? It makes the patch unnecessarily >> bigger (and harder for a review). > > 07/23 starts using tty_wait_for_idle() in tty_ldisc_halt(). > > Should I split this? Yes please. -- js suse labs