From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: dwalsh@redhat.com (Daniel J Walsh)
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 17:35:29 -0500
Subject: [refpolicy] [PATCH/RFC] Reintroduce httpd_user_content_type and
 httpd_user_script_exec_type attributes
In-Reply-To: <1360612981.2559.36.camel@d30>
References: <20130211190233.GA11417@siphos.be> <1360611019.2559.22.camel@d30>
	<20130211193354.GA12406@siphos.be> <1360612981.2559.36.camel@d30>
Message-ID: <51197231.30307@redhat.com>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 02/11/2013 03:03 PM, Dominick Grift wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 20:33 +0100, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 08:30:19PM +0100, Dominick Grift wrote:
>>>> The httpd_user_content_type and httpd_user_script_exec_type
>>>> attributes were erroneously removed a while ago, but while trying to
>>>> reintroduce them I did notice that they were removed because there
>>>> was no way for users to actually use them (or I'm completely
>>>> misreading the policy code).
>>> 
>>> I still do not understand the purpose of this. Is there some actual
>>> need for this? I deprecated the interface because it was unused and i
>>> could not see a convincing need for it to exist.
>>> 
>>> Can you enlighten me? What issue are you facing? Who, other than the 
>>> user needs to be able to manage user content/script dirs, files and 
>>> symlinks?
>> 
>> I'll have to ask Christopher, I made this patch as a result of our
>> previous thread on this matter (where I initially changed a deprecated
>> function to reflect the removal of these types):
>> 
>> http://oss.tresys.com/pipermail/refpolicy/2013-January/006255.html
>> 
>> Wkr, Sven Vermeulen
> 
> 
> Take a looks at why it did this:
> 
>>>> interface(`apache_manage_all_user_content',` refpolicywarn(`$0($*)
>>>> has been deprecated, use
> apache_manage_all_content() instead.')
>>>> apache_manage_all_content($1) ')
> 
> any content was previously considered user content. This was wrong in my 
> view and so i did what i did i pointed it to apache_manage_all_content.
> 
> I know that is also not optimal:
> 
> so maybe change apache_manage_all_user_content() to:
> 
> manage_dirs_pattern($1, { httpd_user_content_t httpd_user_content_rw_t 
> httpd_user_content_ra_t httpd_user_script_exec_t }, { httpd_user_content_t
> httpd_user_content_rw_t httpd_user_content_ra_t httpd_user_script_exec_t
> }) manage_files_pattern($1, { httpd_user_content_t httpd_user_content_rw_t 
> httpd_user_content_ra_t httpd_user_script_exec_t httpd_user_htaccess_t }, {
> httpd_user_content_t httpd_user_content_rw_t httpd_user_content_ra_t
> httpd_user_script_exec_t httpd_user_htaccess_t }) 
> manage_lnk_files_pattern($1, { httpd_user_content_t httpd_user_content_rw_t
> httpd_user_content_ra_t httpd_user_script_exec_t }, { httpd_user_content_t 
> httpd_user_content_rw_t httpd_user_content_ra_t httpd_user_script_exec_t
> })
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ refpolicy mailing list 
> refpolicy at oss.tresys.com http://oss.tresys.com/mailman/listinfo/refpolicy
> 

mkdir /etc/skel/public_html

useradd dwalsh

Will create /home/dwalsh/public_html

I believe.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlEZcjEACgkQrlYvE4MpobMrCgCgxyl1S95Ge0Zca+Nosx9X04L3
R3kAoMO8arzP785N31vaSHiI2ub0p4rp
=2Sae
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----