All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>,
	ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org,
	"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/mm] x86, mm: Use a bitfield to mask nuisance get_user() warnings
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 23:12:49 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5119EB71.6080508@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFzmWfOQzVMPJUah3oEsn-aaeN5qtO=7P3MQUfLZmEFJZA@mail.gmail.com>

Just to be sure, I re-ran the comparison using gcc 4.6.3 instead of gcc
4.7.2.  With gcc 4.6.3 I consistently get a few hundred bytes longer
with the bitfield variant than with the pre-get_user() baseline.

I looked at some of the diffed disassembly, and the differences seem to
be in the code generated downstream of __get_user_1 and __get_user_2,
which I guess is to be expected, mostly in the form of padding.

Annoyingly enough in *both* cases I found unnecessary instructions like:

+c12f6fbb:      0f b7 d2                movzwl %dx,%edx

	-hpa


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-02-12  7:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-12 11:34 [PATCH] x86: Add support for 64bit get_user() on x86-32 ville.syrjala
2012-12-12 16:15 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-12-12 16:32   ` Ville Syrjälä
2012-12-12 16:45     ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-07 16:53 ` Ville Syrjälä
2013-02-07 17:59   ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-08 16:24     ` Ville Syrjälä
2013-02-08 17:30       ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-08 18:23         ` Ville Syrjälä
2013-02-08 19:08           ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-09 10:41             ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-09 11:00               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-12  1:37                 ` [tip:x86/mm] x86, mm: Use a bitfield to mask nuisance get_user() warnings tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-12  3:33                   ` Linus Torvalds
2013-02-12  4:21                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-12  4:42                       ` Linus Torvalds
2013-02-12  4:47                         ` Linus Torvalds
2013-02-12  4:51                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-12  7:12                           ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2013-02-12  8:10                       ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-12 16:38                       ` H.J. Lu
2013-02-12 17:00                         ` Linus Torvalds
2013-02-12 17:14                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-12 17:30                             ` H.J. Lu
2013-02-12 18:25                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-12 18:29                                 ` H.J. Lu
2013-02-12 18:46                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-02-12 18:58                                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-12 20:55                                 ` [tip:x86/mm] x86, mm: Redesign get_user with a __builtin_choose_expr hack tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-12 23:06                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2013-02-12 23:19                                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-12 23:49                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2013-02-12 23:52                                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-13  0:01                                       ` [tip:x86/mm] x86, doc: Clarify the use of asm("%edx") in uaccess.h tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-12 23:21                                     ` [tip:x86/mm] x86, mm: Redesign get_user with a __builtin_choose_expr hack Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-12 17:32                             ` [tip:x86/mm] x86, mm: Use a bitfield to mask nuisance get_user() warnings Linus Torvalds
2013-02-12 17:35                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-12 17:49                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-02-12 17:57                               ` Russell King - ARM Linux

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5119EB71.6080508@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=jamie@shareable.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.