From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.prodrive.nl (mail.prodrive.nl [212.61.153.67]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 434EE2C008E for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 01:03:56 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <511B9D48.20104@prodrive.nl> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 15:03:52 +0100 From: Stef van Os MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] powerpc/85xx: Board support for ppa8548 References: <1359920347-15340-1-git-send-email-stef.van.os@prodrive.nl> <510FD412.4000505@calxeda.com> <8D4EF5B0-BEC6-4114-88CF-166EB3A70A53@kernel.crashing.org> In-Reply-To: <8D4EF5B0-BEC6-4114-88CF-166EB3A70A53@kernel.crashing.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Cc: Scott Wood , Paul Mackerras , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , Timur Tabi List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 02/12/2013 09:09 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Feb 4, 2013, at 9:30 AM, Timur Tabi wrote: > >> On 02/03/2013 01:39 PM, Stef van Os wrote: >> >>> + pci0: pci@fe0008000 { >>> + status = "disabled"; >>> + }; >>> + >>> + pci1: pci@fe0009000 { >>> + status = "disabled"; >>> + }; >>> + >>> + pci2: pcie@fe000a000 { >>> + status = "disabled"; >>> + }; >> >> I was hoping you'd follow my example and include a comment indicating why the PCI devices are all disabled. >> >>> +static void ppa8548_show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m) >>> +{ >>> + uint svid, phid1; >> >> Please don't used unsized integers for hardware registers. >> >> uint32_t svid, phid1; > > > Stef, > > If you'd like this included for 3.9, please make the minor updates. > > thanks > > - k Patches are on their way. Thanks! Stef.