From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefan Priebe Subject: Re: rbd export speed limit Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 21:27:18 +0100 Message-ID: <511BF726.9030606@profihost.ag> References: <511AA47B.3020309@profihost.ag> <511B46A2.4060107@profihost.ag> <511BE8AC.3090600@profihost.ag> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-ph.de-nserver.de ([85.158.179.214]:56370 "EHLO mail-ph.de-nserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932228Ab3BMU1U (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Feb 2013 15:27:20 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Sage Weil Cc: Andrey Korolyov , "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" Hi, Am 13.02.2013 21:21, schrieb Sage Weil: >> This results in writes up to 400Mb/s per OSD and then results in aborted / >> hanging task in VMs. Is it possible to give trim commands lower priority? > > Is that 400Mb or MB? Measured over the network, or on the disk itself? Sorry it's MB - so the SSDs get fully utilized meased via /proc/diskstats . > I'm wondering if this is a lack of punch support on the kernel.. I'm using 3.7.7 running XFS. Greets, Stefan