All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <511C8B3F.6010200@ti.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 4a1f5dd..1b25faa 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ On 2/14/2013 10:46 AM, Vishwanathrao Badarkhe, Manish wrote:
 > Yes, for RTC controlled wakeup, this polling is not required as per section 10.10.2.1.
 > But if we see in section 10.10.2.2 (Exiting Deep Sleep Mode) step 2, When sleep count 
 > completes SLEEPCOMPLETE bit gets sets in DEEPSLEEP register till that it's not safe to 
-> release clock to devices. So If we don?t poll for SLEEPCOMPLETE, this delay will not
+> release clock to devices. So If we don’t poll for SLEEPCOMPLETE, this delay will not
 > come into picture which we actually set while entering deep sleep in case of RTC 
 > controlled wakeup (Section 10.10.2.1 step 9). 
 > Please let me know, whether these understanding is correct?
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index fe228b4..d8b16ff 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -1,10 +1,16 @@
  "ref\01359624393-5898-1-git-send-email-manishv.b@ti.com\0"
  "ref\0511C65B3.7060109@ti.com\0"
  "ref\0A4887BF146CD57468F700B415D2F470158374E@DBDE01.ent.ti.com\0"
- "From\0nsekhar@ti.com (Sekhar Nori)\0"
- "Subject\0[PATCH RFC] davinci: poll for sleep completion in resume routine.\0"
+ "From\0Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH RFC] davinci: poll for sleep completion in resume routine.\0"
  "Date\0Thu, 14 Feb 2013 12:29:11 +0530\0"
- "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
+ "To\0Vishwanathrao Badarkhe"
+ " Manish <manishv.b@ti.com>\0"
+ "Cc\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>"
+  davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com <davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com>
+  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
+  linux@arm.linux.org.uk <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
+ " khilman@deeprootsystems.com <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On 2/14/2013 10:46 AM, Vishwanathrao Badarkhe, Manish wrote:\n"
@@ -27,7 +33,7 @@
  "> Yes, for RTC controlled wakeup, this polling is not required as per section 10.10.2.1.\n"
  "> But if we see in section 10.10.2.2 (Exiting Deep Sleep Mode) step 2, When sleep count \n"
  "> completes SLEEPCOMPLETE bit gets sets in DEEPSLEEP register till that it's not safe to \n"
- "> release clock to devices. So If we don?t poll for SLEEPCOMPLETE, this delay will not\n"
+ "> release clock to devices. So If we don\342\200\231t poll for SLEEPCOMPLETE, this delay will not\n"
  "> come into picture which we actually set while entering deep sleep in case of RTC \n"
  "> controlled wakeup (Section 10.10.2.1 step 9). \n"
  "> Please let me know, whether these understanding is correct?\n"
@@ -39,4 +45,4 @@
  "Thanks,\n"
  Sekhar
 
-d11cab9103cd480bde753bf376564aca3d982c9023fa59b3f4beaaa5a376a192
+1e2d49bc8ec6ecba163a35d0bd1329022a0f4fbe0d4b8d889a6a4e64ef5c6625

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.