From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gmazyland@gmail.com>
Received: from mail.saout.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mail.saout.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id Lahr3u4VBaUD for <dm-crypt@saout.de>;
 Thu, 14 Feb 2013 14:43:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-ee0-f52.google.com (mail-ee0-f52.google.com [74.125.83.52])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS
 for <dm-crypt@saout.de>; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 14:43:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-ee0-f52.google.com with SMTP id b15so1222039eek.25
 for <dm-crypt@saout.de>; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 05:43:20 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <511CE9F5.60708@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 14:43:17 +0100
From: Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAFnMBaRFi3TtQxj3nw6rgfiFmQ4kOiRUAiUJsV7ZacA2xTiAxw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFnMBaRFi3TtQxj3nw6rgfiFmQ4kOiRUAiUJsV7ZacA2xTiAxw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] cryptsetup 1.6.0 crash when attempting to open
 truecrypt volume if the key is large enough
List-Id: <dm-crypt.saout.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.saout.de/mailman/options/dm-crypt>,
 <mailto:dm-crypt-request@saout.de?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.saout.de/pipermail/dm-crypt/>
List-Post: <mailto:dm-crypt@saout.de>
List-Help: <mailto:dm-crypt-request@saout.de?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt>,
 <mailto:dm-crypt-request@saout.de?subject=subscribe>
To: ".. ink .." <mhogomchungu@gmail.com>
Cc: dm-crypt@saout.de


On 02/14/2013 12:44 PM, .. ink .. wrote:
> 
> http://pastebin.com/FqxMUf8Z
> 
> The above link has the source code of the program that show the crash.I have not tried that many key sizes but a key size of 5MB seem to crash cryptsetup

Yes, there was a stupid bug.
http://code.google.com/p/cryptsetup/source/detail?r=e600024908219af09819d1a6549cad2b6813a8f0#

TCRYPT passphrase is in fact limited to maximal 64 characters,
so it fails now early if this limit is exceeded.

Thanks,
Milan