From: swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: of_clk_get() / devm_clk_get()
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 10:28:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <511D1EBE.8010806@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1360824133.22736.3.camel@gitbox>
On 02/13/2013 11:42 PM, Tony Prisk wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 21:40 -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 02/13/2013 09:17 PM, Tony Prisk wrote:
>>> Currently we have devm_clk_get() which gives a managed-resource clk (by
>>> name), or of_clk_get() which gives an unmanaged resource clk (by id).
>>>
>>> I just wanted to sound out everyone as to whether there is a need for a
>>> managed version of the of_clk_get.
>>>
>>> My personal concern about devm_clk_get is that it requires (if I
>>> understand correctly) that the DT node have the clock-names property
>>> (which is optional). If the optional name is not supplied, it fails.
>>> This basically makes it 'not optional' when a driver uses devm_clk_get.
>>> (Please correct me if I'm wrong about this).
>>
>> I thought supplying NULL for the name/ID simply gave you the first clock
>> in the list (clocks property)? I'm sure I've seen plenty of Tegra
>> drivers that end up doing that.
>>
>
> I think someone else told me that once before so it is probably correct
> - but it doesn't solve the problem of requesting a second clock without
> a clock-names property.
>
> That leaves us in the situation of only being able to use managed clocks
> when there is only one, or forcing dts files to include the 'optional'
> property.
True. Writing a devm_ wrapper around of_clk_get() should be pretty
trivial though.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-14 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-14 4:17 of_clk_get() / devm_clk_get() Tony Prisk
2013-02-14 4:40 ` Stephen Warren
2013-02-14 6:42 ` Tony Prisk
2013-02-14 17:28 ` Stephen Warren [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=511D1EBE.8010806@wwwdotorg.org \
--to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.