From: Jeremy Linton <jlinton@tributary.com>
To: James Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: Allow 64-bit LUNs during report lun scan
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 15:21:14 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <511D554A.2090100@tributary.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1360813027.2502.7.camel@dabdike>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 2/13/2013 9:37 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> What advantage does this have over setting max_lun to ~0?
Is it possible the adapters have LUN resource limits as well as ID limits? In
those cases it would be nice to notify the user that LUNs exist, but are not
addressable with the given hba. Of course ignoring the address mode bits keeps
this from working properly as the max_lun needs to be set much larger than the
actual supported lun limit.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRHVVKAAoJEL5i86xrzcy7zCQIAJzMmQbVb6yFDEv3od16xVI3
DN8ZzscwJQcreJfIpyoBPk4d0gjfCXO1Cc/PeMQegNwgc4TmfoLHXj1/61irATjv
GH+xGiJCMxcLX1eIF5D3JC8cleXa+A1YD5ayKeIkYsHSK4S5kPovmS5gzvgJlhPE
N5oToRe5RQda0nAeiV0VMPKuxANud2ZC6N61ncMHAn1wLeI7gq2JBtvZi3NXAfub
IRacak9LN9QLrlrZh6YQdA8RK9LVGHJwCYahBUG1MYH0ceTyoj15BOPLT/El3ET5
6CSpi7a/TMufwpWtLJp4YzVUU2tIvFxIusTbrzMy0ioYSWD9J7Egangs5ue48Xg=
=yyk0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-14 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-13 15:06 [PATCH] scsi: Allow 64-bit LUNs during report lun scan Hannes Reinecke
2013-02-13 19:52 ` Jeremy Linton
2013-02-13 20:21 ` Bart Van Assche
2013-02-14 3:38 ` James Bottomley
2013-02-14 18:02 ` Jeremy Linton
2013-02-14 22:04 ` Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
2013-02-14 22:38 ` Jeremy Linton
2013-02-14 22:44 ` Jeremy Linton
2013-02-15 7:26 ` Hannes Reinecke
2013-02-15 7:33 ` Bart Van Assche
2013-02-15 7:15 ` Hannes Reinecke
2013-02-14 3:37 ` James Bottomley
2013-02-14 21:21 ` Jeremy Linton [this message]
2013-02-15 16:25 ` Jeremy Linton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=511D554A.2090100@tributary.com \
--to=jlinton@tributary.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=jbottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.