From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonas Bonn Subject: Re: [RFC][CFT] what's in signal.git queue Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:29:14 +0100 Message-ID: <511DE3CA.7020801@southpole.se> References: <20130214012539.GQ4503@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.southpole.se ([37.247.8.11]:59628 "EHLO mail.southpole.se" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935388Ab3BOH2q (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Feb 2013 02:28:46 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20130214012539.GQ4503@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Al Viro Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Catalin Marinas , Haavard Skinnemoen , Mike Frysinger , Jesper Nilsson , David Howells , Tony Luck , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Hirokazu Takata , Geert Uytterhoeven , Michal Simek , "James E.J. Bottomley" , Richard Kuo , Martin Schwidefsky , Lennox Wu , "David S. Miller" , Paul Mundt , Chris Zankel , Chris Metcalf , Yoshinori Sato , Guan Xuetao On 02/14/13 02:25, Al Viro wrote: > At that point the common stem ends; as far as I'm concerned, this part is > in never-rebase mode by now. Then comes a bunch of per-architecture branches; > all subject to ACK by maintainers (ones who are not MIA, that is ;-/). Once > maintainer(s) are OK with a branch, it's in no-rebase mode as well. Branch > names are of form arch-, same as the last time around. > > I tested the arch-openrisc branch and it looks good. Acked-by: Jonas Bonn /Jonas From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.southpole.se ([37.247.8.11]:59628 "EHLO mail.southpole.se" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935388Ab3BOH2q (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Feb 2013 02:28:46 -0500 Message-ID: <511DE3CA.7020801@southpole.se> Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:29:14 +0100 From: Jonas Bonn MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [RFC][CFT] what's in signal.git queue References: <20130214012539.GQ4503@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20130214012539.GQ4503@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Al Viro Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Catalin Marinas , Haavard Skinnemoen , Mike Frysinger , Jesper Nilsson , David Howells , Tony Luck , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Hirokazu Takata , Geert Uytterhoeven , Michal Simek , "James E.J. Bottomley" , Richard Kuo , Martin Schwidefsky , Lennox Wu , "David S. Miller" , Paul Mundt , Chris Zankel , Chris Metcalf , Yoshinori Sato , Guan Xuetao , Russell King Message-ID: <20130215072914.F6DOtn18-OZNjBwIvbnB0x_vnviJ-4uI3uhNA4Q0CeE@z> On 02/14/13 02:25, Al Viro wrote: > At that point the common stem ends; as far as I'm concerned, this part is > in never-rebase mode by now. Then comes a bunch of per-architecture branches; > all subject to ACK by maintainers (ones who are not MIA, that is ;-/). Once > maintainer(s) are OK with a branch, it's in no-rebase mode as well. Branch > names are of form arch-, same as the last time around. > > I tested the arch-openrisc branch and it looks good. Acked-by: Jonas Bonn /Jonas