From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Santosh Shilimkar Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH 1/2] ARM: OMAP2+: hwmod-data: UART IP needs software control of sidle modes Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 18:26:28 +0530 Message-ID: <511E307C.8010600@ti.com> References: <1360930106-32005-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <20130215125055.GA16558@arwen.pp.htv.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from comal.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.152]:60857 "EHLO comal.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161340Ab3BOMzX (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Feb 2013 07:55:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20130215125055.GA16558@arwen.pp.htv.fi> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: balbi@ti.com Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, khilman@deeprootsystems.com, paul@pwsan.com, tony@atomide.com, sourav.poddar@ti.com, vaibhav.bedia@ti.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Rajendra Nayak On Friday 15 February 2013 06:20 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 05:38:26PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >> OMAP UART IP needs manual idle modes based on state of the >> IP. Currently this is handled by the driver with function pointers >> implemented in platform code. >> >> This however breaks in case of device tree because of missing >> idle handling. With the provided flags, idle mode handling is transparently >> handled by runtime time pm code. > > this last sentence can be improved a bit. > Indeed. Regards, Santosh From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 18:26:28 +0530 Subject: [RFC/RFT PATCH 1/2] ARM: OMAP2+: hwmod-data: UART IP needs software control of sidle modes In-Reply-To: <20130215125055.GA16558@arwen.pp.htv.fi> References: <1360930106-32005-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> <20130215125055.GA16558@arwen.pp.htv.fi> Message-ID: <511E307C.8010600@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Friday 15 February 2013 06:20 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 05:38:26PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >> OMAP UART IP needs manual idle modes based on state of the >> IP. Currently this is handled by the driver with function pointers >> implemented in platform code. >> >> This however breaks in case of device tree because of missing >> idle handling. With the provided flags, idle mode handling is transparently >> handled by runtime time pm code. > > this last sentence can be improved a bit. > Indeed. Regards, Santosh