From: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Accumulating PPC_FEATURE_ARCH bits
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:06:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51225F80.3030706@twiddle.net> (raw)
If one wants to test the PPC_FEATURE_ARCH_ISA_2_0[56] bits, one has to
be careful that if 2_06 is set, 2_05 won't be. This seems illogical to
me: given that 2.06 includes all of the 2.05 instructions, it would make
most sense if both bits were set in the hwcap.
Now, obviously I have to code around existing practice, but going
forward this isn't tennable. When a Power 2.07 ISA is released, I'd
rather not have existing programs degrade because suddenly the 2_06 bit
is no longer set.
Thanks,
r~
reply other threads:[~2013-02-18 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51225F80.3030706@twiddle.net \
--to=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.