From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp4.nedap.com ([213.160.213.85] helo=smtp.nedap.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U7p3H-0003sR-Cv for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:24:20 +0100 Received: from nvs0066.nedap.local (10.91.8.1) by relaysmtp1.nedap.local (10.1.8.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.279.5; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:08:00 +0100 X-TM-IMSS-Message-ID: <21a9f8220000a257@nedap.com> Received: from [10.2.40.10] ([10.2.40.10]) by nedap.com ([10.91.8.1]) with ESMTP (TREND IMSS SMTP Service 7.1) id 21a9f8220000a257 ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:07:55 +0100 Message-ID: <5123954F.1000306@nedap.com> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:07:59 +0100 From: Jaap de Jong User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <511E373D.1070109@nedap.com> <5121F224.4080906@nedap.com> <51238222.40804@nedap.com> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: opkg-make-index not found X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:24:22 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/19/2013 03:33 PM, Takeshi Hamasaki wrote: > Then I recommend to look into log files. For my case, after executing commands: > > $ bitbake package-index -c cleansstate > $ bitbake -D -D package-index > bitbake-d-d.package-index 2> errlog > > I have at least four log files. > 1. bitbake-d-d.package-index in current dir > 2. errlog in current dir > 3. run.do_package_index.* in > build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/work/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/package-index-1.0-r0 > 4. log.do_package_index.* in > build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_05-eglibc/work/armv5te-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/package-index-1.0-r0 > > (Actually, I skipped to generate 2., my build succeed.) > I guess you can find some clue looking into 4., 3., and maybe 1. > > I attach mine to this mail, and hope they might be some help for you. Thanks for all your help! I've been comparing the run.do_package_index file from myself and from the buildserver. If I look at it the only real difference (besides paths etc) are in the SHELL > export SHELL="/usr/local/bin/bash-wrapper" < export SHELL="/bin/bash" I will ask my administrator to change it and will retry.