* [PATCH 2/2] nvme: fix the placement of set_current_state to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE [not found] <51103A15.8010508@linux.intel.com> @ 2013-02-19 15:05 ` Matthew Wilcox 2013-02-19 16:30 ` Arjan van de Ven 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Matthew Wilcox @ 2013-02-19 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw) On Mon, Feb 04, 2013@02:45:41PM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > the nvme driver has a kthread that processes certain events periodically. > However, the kthread also gets woken for certain urgent actions. > > The current code does not use the current_state logic correctly; > it calls set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); right before doing > a schedule_timeout(), with the result that there is a race condition > where a wakeup can get lost, and thus delayed by one second. > > This patch moves the set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); to before > the place where the queue of outstanding work is checked, to close > the race condition The thing is, that's not a queue of outstanding work, that's the list of devices that exist in the system. Your patch makes the kthread do all of its work in the TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE state, which I don't think is right either (is it?) We could add a flag to indicate that there's urgent work to be done (checked after setting TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE), or just live with the occasional race. Alternatively, we could get rid of the kthread in favour of timers for cancelling commands and a workqueue for dealing with urgent work. I have this on my long-term todo list, but in the absence of having hardware to test with on large-scale systems, I didn't want to make such a large change. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] nvme: fix the placement of set_current_state to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE 2013-02-19 15:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvme: fix the placement of set_current_state to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE Matthew Wilcox @ 2013-02-19 16:30 ` Arjan van de Ven 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Arjan van de Ven @ 2013-02-19 16:30 UTC (permalink / raw) On 2/19/2013 7:05 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Mon, Feb 04, 2013@02:45:41PM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote: >> the nvme driver has a kthread that processes certain events periodically. >> However, the kthread also gets woken for certain urgent actions. >> >> The current code does not use the current_state logic correctly; >> it calls set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); right before doing >> a schedule_timeout(), with the result that there is a race condition >> where a wakeup can get lost, and thus delayed by one second. >> >> This patch moves the set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); to before >> the place where the queue of outstanding work is checked, to close >> the race condition > > The thing is, that's not a queue of outstanding work, that's the list > of devices that exist in the system. Your patch makes the kthread do > all of its work in the TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE state, which I don't think is > right either (is it?) eh why not? it counts to load average, but frankly, you're using CPU... you count anyway ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-02-19 16:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <51103A15.8010508@linux.intel.com>
2013-02-19 15:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvme: fix the placement of set_current_state to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE Matthew Wilcox
2013-02-19 16:30 ` Arjan van de Ven
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.