From: Steven Haigh <netwiz@crc.id.au>
To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: 4.2.1: Poor write performance for DomU.
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:10:17 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51243089.8020307@crc.id.au> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5443 bytes --]
Hi guys,
Firstly, please CC me in to any replies as I'm not a subscriber these days.
I've been trying to debug a problem with Xen 4.2.1 where I am unable to
achieve more than ~50Mb/sec sustained sequential write to a disk. The
DomU is configured as such:
name = "zeus.vm"
memory = 1024
vcpus = 2
cpus = "1-3"
disk = [ 'phy:/dev/RAID1/zeus.vm,xvda,w',
'phy:/dev/vg_raid6/fileshare,xvdb,w' ]
vif = [ "mac=02:16:36:35:35:09, bridge=br203,
vifname=vm.zeus.203", "mac=10:16:36:35:35:09, bridge=br10,
vifname=vm.zeus.10" ]
bootloader = "pygrub"
on_poweroff = 'destroy'
on_reboot = 'restart'
on_crash = 'restart'
I have tested the underlying LVM config by mounting
/dev/vg_raid6/fileshare from within the Dom0 and running bonnie++ as a
benchmark:
Version 1.96 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input-
--Random-
Concurrency 1 -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block--
--Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP
/sec %CP
xenhost.lan.crc. 2G 667 96 186976 21 80430 14 956 95 290591 26
373.7 8
Latency 26416us 212ms 168ms 35494us 35989us 83759us
Version 1.96 ------Sequential Create------ --------Random
Create--------
xenhost.lan.crc.id. -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read---
-Delete--
files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
/sec %CP
16 14901 32 +++++ +++ 19672 39 15307 34 +++++ +++
18158 37
Latency 17838us 141us 298us 365us 133us 296us
~186Mb/sec write, ~290Mb/sec read. Awesome.
I then started a single DomU which gets passed /dev/vg_raid6/fileshare
through as xvdb. It is then mounted in /mnt/fileshare/. I then ran
bonnie++ again in the DomU:
Version 1.96 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input-
--Random-
Concurrency 1 -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block--
--Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP
/sec %CP
zeus.crc.id.au 2G 658 96 50618 8 42398 10 1138 99 267568 30
494.9 11
Latency 22959us 226ms 311ms 14617us 41816us 72814us
Version 1.96 ------Sequential Create------ --------Random
Create--------
zeus.crc.id.au -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read---
-Delete--
files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
/sec %CP
16 21749 59 +++++ +++ 31089 73 23283 64 +++++ +++
31114 75
Latency 18989us 164us 928us 480us 26us 87us
~50Mb/sec write, ~267Mb/sec read. Not so awesome.
/dev/vg_raid6/fileshare exists as an LV on /dev/md2:
# lvdisplay vg_raid6/fileshare
--- Logical volume ---
LV Path /dev/vg_raid6/fileshare
LV Name fileshare
VG Name vg_raid6
LV UUID cwC0yK-Xr56-WB5v-10bw-3AZT-pYj0-piWett
LV Write Access read/write
LV Creation host, time xenhost.lan.crc.id.au, 2013-02-18 20:59:40 +1100
LV Status available
# open 1
LV Size 2.50 TiB
Current LE 655360
Segments 1
Allocation inherit
Read ahead sectors auto
- currently set to 1024
Block device 253:5
md2 : active raid6 sdd[4] sdc[0] sde[1] sdf[5]
3907026688 blocks super 1.2 level 6, 128k chunk, algorithm 2
[4/4] [UUUU]
Heres a quick output of 'xm info' - although its full VM load is running
now:
# xm info
host : xenhost.lan.crc.id.au
release : 3.7.9-1.el6xen.x86_64
version : #1 SMP Mon Feb 18 14:46:35 EST 2013
machine : x86_64
nr_cpus : 4
nr_nodes : 1
cores_per_socket : 4
threads_per_core : 1
cpu_mhz : 3303
hw_caps :
bfebfbff:28100800:00000000:00003f40:179ae3bf:00000000:00000001:00000000
virt_caps : hvm
total_memory : 8116
free_memory : 1346
free_cpus : 0
xen_major : 4
xen_minor : 2
xen_extra : .1
xen_caps : xen-3.0-x86_64 xen-3.0-x86_32p hvm-3.0-x86_32
hvm-3.0-x86_32p hvm-3.0-x86_64
xen_scheduler : credit
xen_pagesize : 4096
platform_params : virt_start=0xffff800000000000
xen_changeset : unavailable
xen_commandline : dom0_mem=1024M cpufreq=xen dom0_max_vcpus=1
dom0_vcpus_pin
cc_compiler : gcc (GCC) 4.4.6 20120305 (Red Hat 4.4.6-4)
cc_compile_by : mockbuild
cc_compile_domain : crc.id.au
cc_compile_date : Sat Feb 16 19:16:38 EST 2013
xend_config_format : 4
In a nutshell, does anyone know *why* I am only able to get ~50Mb/sec
sequential writes to the DomU? It certainly isn't a problem getting
normal speeds to the LV while mounted in the Dom0.
All OS are Scientific Linux 6.3. The Dom0 runs packages from my
kernel-xen repo (http://au1.mirror.crc.id.au/repo/el6/x86_64/). The DomU
is completely stock packages.
--
Steven Haigh
Email: netwiz@crc.id.au
Web: http://www.crc.id.au
Phone: (03) 9001 6090 - 0412 935 897
Fax: (03) 8338 0299
[-- Attachment #1.2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4240 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next reply other threads:[~2013-02-20 2:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-20 2:10 Steven Haigh [this message]
2013-02-20 8:26 ` 4.2.1: Poor write performance for DomU Roger Pau Monné
2013-02-20 8:49 ` Steven Haigh
2013-02-20 9:49 ` Steven Haigh
2013-02-20 10:12 ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-20 11:06 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-02-20 11:08 ` Steven Haigh
2013-02-20 12:48 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-02-20 13:18 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2013-03-08 20:42 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-03-08 8:54 ` Steven Haigh
2013-03-08 9:43 ` Roger Pau Monné
2013-03-08 9:46 ` Steven Haigh
2013-03-08 9:54 ` Roger Pau Monné
2013-03-08 20:49 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-03-08 22:30 ` Steven Haigh
2013-03-11 13:30 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-03-11 13:37 ` Steven Haigh
2013-03-12 13:04 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-03-12 14:08 ` Steven Haigh
[not found] ` <514EA337.7030303@crc.id.au>
[not found] ` <514EA6B0.8010504@crc.id.au>
[not found] ` <514EA741.7050403@crc.id.au>
2013-03-24 9:10 ` Steven Haigh
2013-03-24 9:54 ` Steven Haigh
2013-03-25 2:21 ` Steven Haigh
2013-08-20 16:48 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-08-20 18:25 ` Steven Haigh
2013-09-05 8:28 ` Steven Haigh
2013-09-06 13:33 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-09-06 23:06 ` Steven Haigh
2013-09-06 23:37 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51243089.8020307@crc.id.au \
--to=netwiz@crc.id.au \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.