All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Haigh <netwiz@crc.id.au>
To: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: 4.2.1: Poor write performance for DomU.
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 19:49:39 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51248E23.7060408@crc.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <512488AC.1020702@citrix.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2086 bytes --]

On 20/02/2013 7:26 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On 20/02/13 03:10, Steven Haigh wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> Firstly, please CC me in to any replies as I'm not a subscriber these days.
>>
>> I've been trying to debug a problem with Xen 4.2.1 where I am unable to
>> achieve more than ~50Mb/sec sustained sequential write to a disk. The
>> DomU is configured as such:
>
> Since you mention 4.2.1 explicitly, is this a performance regression
> from previous versions? (4.2.0 or the 4.1 branch)

This is actually a very good question. I've reinstalled my older 
packages of Xen 4.1.3 back on the system. Rebooting into the new 
hypervisor, then starting the single DomU again. Ran bonnie++ again on 
the DomU:

Version  1.96       ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- 
--Random-
Concurrency   1     -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- 
--Seeks--
Machine        Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP 
/sec %CP
zeus.crc.id.au   2G   658  97 54893   9 40845  10  1056  97 280453  33 
561.2  13
Latency             27145us     426ms     257ms   31900us   24701us 
222ms
Version  1.96       ------Sequential Create------ --------Random 
Create--------
zeus.crc.id.au      -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- 
-Delete--
               files  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP 
/sec %CP
                  16 19281  52 +++++ +++ +++++ +++ 24435  66 +++++ +++ 
+++++ +++
Latency             22860us     182us     706us   14803us      28us 
300us


Still around 50Mb/sec - so this doesn't seem to be a regression, but 
something else?


>> ~50Mb/sec write, ~267Mb/sec read. Not so awesome.
>
> We are currently working on improving the speed of pv block drivers, I
> will look into this difference between the read/write speed, but I would
> guess this is due to the size of the request/ring.

I would assume this would be in the DomU kernel?

-- 
Steven Haigh

Email: netwiz@crc.id.au
Web: http://www.crc.id.au
Phone: (03) 9001 6090 - 0412 935 897
Fax: (03) 8338 0299


[-- Attachment #1.2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4240 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-20  8:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-20  2:10 4.2.1: Poor write performance for DomU Steven Haigh
2013-02-20  8:26 ` Roger Pau Monné
2013-02-20  8:49   ` Steven Haigh [this message]
2013-02-20  9:49     ` Steven Haigh
2013-02-20 10:12       ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-20 11:06         ` Andrew Cooper
2013-02-20 11:08           ` Steven Haigh
2013-02-20 12:48             ` Andrew Cooper
2013-02-20 13:18             ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2013-03-08 20:42               ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-03-08  8:54       ` Steven Haigh
2013-03-08  9:43         ` Roger Pau Monné
2013-03-08  9:46           ` Steven Haigh
2013-03-08  9:54             ` Roger Pau Monné
2013-03-08 20:49         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-03-08 22:30           ` Steven Haigh
2013-03-11 13:30             ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-03-11 13:37               ` Steven Haigh
2013-03-12 13:04                 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-03-12 14:08                   ` Steven Haigh
     [not found]                   ` <514EA337.7030303@crc.id.au>
     [not found]                     ` <514EA6B0.8010504@crc.id.au>
     [not found]                       ` <514EA741.7050403@crc.id.au>
2013-03-24  9:10                         ` Steven Haigh
2013-03-24  9:54                           ` Steven Haigh
2013-03-25  2:21                           ` Steven Haigh
2013-08-20 16:48                             ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-08-20 18:25                               ` Steven Haigh
2013-09-05  8:28                               ` Steven Haigh
2013-09-06 13:33                                 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-09-06 23:06                                   ` Steven Haigh
2013-09-06 23:37                                     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51248E23.7060408@crc.id.au \
    --to=netwiz@crc.id.au \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.