From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: r.sricharan@ti.com (R Sricharan)
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:56:48 +0530
Subject: [PATCH V6] ARM: LPAE: Fix mapping in alloc_init_section for
 unaligned addresses
In-Reply-To: <5118F796.3080308@ti.com>
References: <1360574009-12429-1-git-send-email-r.sricharan@ti.com>
 <20130211131230.GA5676@MacBook-Pro.local> <5118F796.3080308@ti.com>
Message-ID: <51261288.5030806@ti.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi,
On Monday 11 February 2013 07:22 PM, R Sricharan wrote:
> Hi Russell,
>
> On Monday 11 February 2013 06:42 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 09:13:29AM +0000, R Sricharan wrote:
>>> +static void __init alloc_init_pmd(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr,
>>> +                      unsigned long end, phys_addr_t phys,
>>> +                      const struct mem_type *type)
>>> +{
>>> +    pmd_t *pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
>>> +    unsigned long next;
>>> +
>>> +    do {
>>>           /*
>>> -         * No need to loop; pte's aren't interested in the
>>> -         * individual L1 entries.
>>> +         * With LPAE, we must loop over to map
>>> +         * all the pmds for the given range.
>>>            */
>>> -        alloc_init_pte(pmd, addr, end, __phys_to_pfn(phys), type);
>>> -    }
>>> +        next = pmd_addr_end(addr, end);
>>> +
>>> +        /*
>>> +         * Try a section mapping - end, addr and phys must all be
>>> +         * aligned to a section boundary.
>>> +         */
>>
>> Should this read "next, addr and phys" instead of "end..."?
>>
>> Otherwise:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>>
>   Can I put this in to patch system ?

    Ping..

Regards,
  Sricharan