All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
Cc: Sujith Manoharan <sujith@msujith.org>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 3.7.6+: ath9k: tx logic locks up after taking attenuation very high.
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:53:12 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5126B368.9010209@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmo=FC=jdJ9VyZtZy_nbdGhCCfJ9dhS3993fwneGhFjoBJg@mail.gmail.com>

On 02/21/2013 03:49 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> .. so the current code correctly soft fails all of those frames and
> puts them back onto the relevant software queues, right?

I might have been mistaken.  Further testing makes me think the
pending-frames are properly dealt with.  I see them show back up
in the tx-complete logic about 30 second after the first chip reset logic hits.

That seems quite long to me, but then again, it appears that without a chip
reset, they never show back up in the tx-complete logic at all (and thus
the hang).

I'm testing now with just the pending-frames lockup check with a plain
chip reset as work-around (and no fiddling with pending-frames counter).

Thanks,
Ben

>
>
> Adrian
>


-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com


  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-21 23:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-11 18:18 3.7.6+: ath9k: tx logic locks up after taking attenuation very high Ben Greear
2013-02-12  0:11 ` Sujith Manoharan
2013-02-13 16:41   ` Ben Greear
2013-02-19  2:14     ` Sujith Manoharan
2013-02-19  2:36       ` Sujith Manoharan
2013-02-19  5:18         ` Ben Greear
2013-02-20 22:51       ` Ben Greear
2013-02-21  1:06         ` Ben Greear
2013-02-21  1:38           ` Sujith Manoharan
2013-02-21  5:41             ` Ben Greear
2013-02-21 17:34               ` Ben Greear
2013-02-21 23:11                 ` Ben Greear
2013-02-21 23:49                   ` Adrian Chadd
2013-02-21 23:53                     ` Ben Greear [this message]
2013-02-21 23:56                       ` Adrian Chadd
2013-02-22  0:11                         ` Ben Greear
2013-02-22  4:23                   ` Sujith Manoharan
2013-02-21  1:36         ` Sujith Manoharan
2013-02-21  2:02           ` Ben Greear
2013-02-21  2:04             ` Sujith Manoharan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5126B368.9010209@candelatech.com \
    --to=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=adrian@freebsd.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sujith@msujith.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.