From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: ceph internals : buffer lists Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 10:37:40 +0100 Message-ID: <51288DE4.6090306@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig2FEE98B1767AB8D7D79615A4" Return-path: Received: from smtp.dmail.dachary.org ([86.65.39.20]:53311 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755453Ab3BWJhm (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Feb 2013 04:37:42 -0500 Received: from [10.8.0.50] (unknown [10.8.0.50]) by smtp.dmail.dachary.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F73926396 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 10:37:41 +0100 (CET) Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig2FEE98B1767AB8D7D79615A4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, As a followup to my work on the buffer lists ( https://github.com/ceph/ce= ph/commit/fb472a57c6a17e9d2f74a5d226e4e0c91ae9f2a2#src/test/bufferlist.cc= ), I wrote down an article explaining how they work http://dachary.org/?p=3D1904 I hope it will be useful to developers who need a quick overview. If ther= e are mistakes or mis-conceptions, please let me know and I'll fix it. Cheers --=20 Lo=EFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --------------enig2FEE98B1767AB8D7D79615A4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlEojeQACgkQ8dLMyEl6F23W/QCeNM3q66EOANdFj/cFlgian9dj CZ4AoK8Xb32kASg5XeyyDSRxdWwZoGTr =cqyr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig2FEE98B1767AB8D7D79615A4--