Re: [PATCH] connman: enable connman client

[Jack Mitchell <ml@communistcode.co.uk>]

On 02/23/13 11:30, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Saturday 23 February 2013 09:02:07 Jack Mitchell wrote:
>> On 02/23/13 08:34, Ross Burton wrote:
>>> Also the fact that you have to do this is depressing.  I wonder why
>>> upstream doesn't want to install any of the tools?
>> Connmanctl is a helper, even though I have connman in my image, I
>> wouldn't want connmanctl. I assume this is why they don't ship it by
>> default; as my use case is fairly normal for connman.
> I would have thought if you had asked for the client to be built (or not asked
> for it not to be built, as the case may be) then surely you would want it
> installed (as far as make install goes anyway)?

Yes I misread, I thought we were explicity enabling it. I'll try to send 
an email off to upstream and see what they think.

>
>> Which leads to the next point, this should be a seperate package.
> Probably should be I think yes.

If no one beats me to it I'll look into this at work next week. Some of 
the tools should be split into packages too and I think there may be 
some distro specific tweaks also (e.g. wifi enabled etc).

>
> Cheers,
> Paul
>