From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1U9gS3-0000tc-S5 for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 13:37:31 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:32952) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9gS1-0000t4-GT for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 13:37:30 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9gS0-0005Wh-2t for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 13:37:29 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com ([209.85.212.178]:62781) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9gRz-0005WT-TW for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 13:37:28 -0500 Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id o1so2429534wic.5 for ; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 10:37:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; bh=Y5PdIpU1KGyzPFaBKMG1b77WzrLmrLDhh33z0ukUPzg=; b=issVB7WY1RF55sMEWsrJin5ROYJMDLIuwKykuXIq/wWUFGziHezRwKsZXHnCkiTWd0 EaBVq7BcfayVmD4K6umRzRajrSthu6RI8IC4MTGLcyP1VzQBzpbfT0cgkZp4RBCsXY0U 1yzE6o+NjYYHGWzzrOhDKja1juWPKNCL1+eEdhHEbhU2d9P2kzVWf65mME6QOZMEF+J9 DywehtaR6U15vqj4tbxRJ333np25zOzxh6kqsHkH4jhLp0hVkIoJw2Qb4Qrn9dz+1LLx tdwJnZPAethBGfSwoHafFUtnEtAamQBFkaHu+v1o8A5rqKLsqVOHqSU7NwP/v2LRBApP Dt4w== X-Received: by 10.180.78.135 with SMTP id b7mr7766382wix.14.1361731046722; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 10:37:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian.x201.phnet (245-188.1-85.cust.bluewin.ch. [85.1.188.245]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ek4sm10444335wib.11.2013.02.24.10.37.25 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 24 Feb 2013 10:37:25 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <512A5DDA.80509@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 19:37:14 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?VmxhZGltaXIgJ8+GLWNvZGVyL3BoY29kZXInIFNlcmJpbmVua28=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130116 Icedove/10.0.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: grub-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Long USB transfers problem References: <1354402009.2479.108.camel@pracovna> <50FC659C.6020105@gmail.com> <1360624408.2624.88.camel@pracovna> In-Reply-To: <1360624408.2624.88.camel@pracovna> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig5900E915E117694F946FDCAB" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.212.178 X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 18:37:30 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig5900E915E117694F946FDCAB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > What do you prefer - this "improved" bulk transfer limiting or the > simple original one? Did you really see the devices with max_packet_size more than 1024? It's the maximum I see with my HDD adapters. And currently we don't look at max_packet_size at all. This should be fixed first. I'm looking into it n= ow. --------------enig5900E915E117694F946FDCAB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREKAAYFAlEqXeQACgkQNak7dOguQgkkzQD9HOXWw/ld9C8+ya5TUMcEiyHr kgCA0zyO/T17UliA3ssBAKeUc6JTjmf84/hvguM2hN19kzEcQInG2fzlH/oXR7G4 =G8F1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig5900E915E117694F946FDCAB--