From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1U9hCP-0006js-5u for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 14:25:25 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53584) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9hCM-0006jk-Of for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 14:25:23 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9hCK-0002kt-QU for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 14:25:22 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com ([209.85.212.174]:47581) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9hCK-0002kn-JC for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 14:25:20 -0500 Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id hi8so2639300wib.13 for ; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:25:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; bh=LVNgG1Dod3WHjCmR6mA0VEeEMUig5N/H9oMvutki9n4=; b=D7K7B7pxBI0PQFClPPtMQDEWnCc3gVRop5HXqiwFeY2VJv+EMeSwQ2Cl2h7Rn+9M10 lC8aQQP4he4NhD29aTa82Cv8GdH/OmOa6N+xZ12tW90o3Qq+5sp1Q44om4/Dzxw6j8vA pAP2VHkhowAQVgLKenyzNJXkvYXGGru/LavVXFe1z88DBt4cig90/y8DbcNlkZJYGpaX nvkD3qXEGx+68CNGHWhMtXxlzzUv93XdNZdNh7wTwidjfRUJx+z68H8rZjPXJI3kFjsX lnv7jmVTnxeaq/nY5YgZYPo+akzhDNbrwYcNCAbzakg/OMPsvwQkl0AXDOg4rFyKS7AP /zGg== X-Received: by 10.180.84.162 with SMTP id a2mr7892289wiz.14.1361733919850; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:25:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian.x201.phnet (245-188.1-85.cust.bluewin.ch. [85.1.188.245]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ek4sm10691502wib.11.2013.02.24.11.25.18 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:25:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <512A6911.6080706@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 20:25:05 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?VmxhZGltaXIgJ8+GLWNvZGVyL3BoY29kZXInIFNlcmJpbmVua28=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130116 Icedove/10.0.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The development of GNU GRUB Subject: Re: [PATCH] Long USB transfers problem References: <1354402009.2479.108.camel@pracovna> <50FC659C.6020105@gmail.com> <1360624408.2624.88.camel@pracovna> In-Reply-To: <1360624408.2624.88.camel@pracovna> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig53284FD59F5C75D60DBBB5D8" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.212.174 X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 19:25:23 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig53284FD59F5C75D60DBBB5D8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > What do you prefer - this "improved" bulk transfer limiting or the > simple original one? I misread what patch does. It looks better now. Can you propagate the change to bulk_write as well, like in the patch I sent? >=20 > BR, > Ales >=20 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Grub-devel mailing list > Grub-devel@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel --------------enig53284FD59F5C75D60DBBB5D8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREKAAYFAlEqaREACgkQNak7dOguQgnTcgEAjIF+LAO1rrLzMgqfKa+sao0O wmP5iuObugK5MU4kcZoA/j6OnfU6OZ6w7uR7FwkXoyE3hfHKq91QTs4jlf4n+wee =T/31 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig53284FD59F5C75D60DBBB5D8--