From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Anders Blomdell <anders.blomdell@control.lth.se>
Cc: Xenomai <xenomai@xenomai.org>
Subject: Re: [Xenomai] kernel BUG at arch/x86/kernel/ipipe.c:589! on motherboard DX79SI
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 12:11:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <512B46E6.4080308@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <512B3A5F.5000707@control.lth.se>
On 2013-02-25 11:18, Anders Blomdell wrote:
> On 2013-02-15 16:26, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2013-02-15 16:15, Anders Blomdell wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have a DX79SI that dies with "kernel BUG at
>>> arch/x86/kernel/ipipe.c:589!" when running Xenomai. This is not very
>>> surprising since when running the system with an ordinary kernel thera
>>> are a few 'do_IRQ: X.Y No irq handler for vector (irq -1)' each day.
>>>
>>> Question is if it would be possible to do something less fatal than
>>> 'BUG_ON(irq < 0);' in the code below:
>>
>> This remains a bug that has to be understood.
>>
>>>
>>> int __ipipe_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
>>> {
>>> struct ipipe_percpu_data *p = __ipipe_this_cpu_ptr(&ipipe_percpu);
>>> int irq, vector = regs->orig_ax, flags = 0;
>>> struct pt_regs *tick_regs;
>>>
>>> if (likely(vector < 0)) {
>>> irq = __this_cpu_read(vector_irq[~vector]);
>>> BUG_ON(irq < 0);
>>> } else { /* Software-generated. */
>>> irq = vector;
>>> flags = IPIPE_IRQF_NOACK;
>>> }
>>
>> Kernel 3.5.7 with latest I-pipe?
> Yes.
>
>> This is the second report of this kind,
>> see [1] for the discussion and suggestions. If you don't have KGDB and
>> that kind enabled, try Gilles' instrumentations.
> After a running xenomai five and a half day on a DX58SO motherboard, the
> system crashed, leaving a single 'do_IRQ: 2.166 No irq handler for
> vector (irq -1)' on our logserver.
>
> I'm planning to put in Gilles instrumentations and change the BUG_ON to
> a WARN_ON/WARN, but what should I return after that (my guess is a
> 'return 1', but waiting a week to be proved wrong would be a waste of
> time :-).
Err, what was the test setup that generated the Linux error but not the
I-pipe BUG_ON? Was it a Xenomai-enabled kernel with the BUG_ON removed?
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SDP-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-25 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-15 15:15 [Xenomai] kernel BUG at arch/x86/kernel/ipipe.c:589! on motherboard DX79SI Anders Blomdell
2013-02-15 15:26 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-02-15 15:34 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-02-25 10:18 ` Anders Blomdell
2013-02-25 11:11 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2013-02-25 11:53 ` Anders Blomdell
2013-02-25 12:27 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2013-02-25 14:39 ` Anders Blomdell
2013-02-25 14:53 ` Philippe Gerum
2013-02-25 14:54 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-02-25 15:17 ` Anders Blomdell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=512B46E6.4080308@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=anders.blomdell@control.lth.se \
--cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.