From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH #upstream] libata: export local port number through /sys Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:16:43 -0500 Message-ID: <512BD4BB.7000206@pobox.com> References: <1359049929-17069-1-git-send-email-dmilburn@redhat.com> <512BD1DA.80305@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-qa0-f42.google.com ([209.85.216.42]:54757 "EHLO mail-qa0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759604Ab3BYVQq (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:16:46 -0500 Received: by mail-qa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id cr7so1886588qab.8 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 13:16:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <512BD1DA.80305@redhat.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: David Milburn Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, kay.sievers@vrfy.org, coughlan@redhat.com, fengguang.wu@intel.com, gwendal@google.com On 02/25/2013 04:04 PM, David Milburn wrote: > Hi Jeff, Gwendal, Kay, > > Any thoughts on this patch, is this something we could consider for > 3.9? As I noted in the upstream push email (and associated git tag text), it did not seem like all parties were happy with the sysfs layout. Jeff