From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com (arroyo.ext.ti.com [192.94.94.40]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93F19E0027C for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 12:27:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from dlelxv30.itg.ti.com ([172.17.2.17]) by arroyo.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id r1QKR6ep000555 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:27:06 -0600 Received: from DFLE72.ent.ti.com (dfle72.ent.ti.com [128.247.5.109]) by dlelxv30.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r1QKR6Lp003932 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:27:06 -0600 Received: from dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (172.17.1.197) by dfle72.ent.ti.com (128.247.5.109) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:27:06 -0600 Received: from [172.24.52.55] (h52-55.vpn.ti.com [172.24.52.55]) by dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r1QKR5QC012353; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:27:05 -0600 Message-ID: <512D1ABB.4080304@ti.com> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 15:27:39 -0500 From: Tom Rini Organization: Texas Instruments User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Hernandez, Carlos" References: <1361903920-16650-1-git-send-email-m-karicheri2@ti.com> <512D0217.7090100@ti.com> <20130226192023.GL6725@denix.org> <512D0D9F.8050705@ti.com> <32B5D12402BE454796026F6AC58AA86E2E71F333@DLEE09.ent.ti.com> In-Reply-To: <32B5D12402BE454796026F6AC58AA86E2E71F333@DLEE09.ent.ti.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5 Cc: "meta-ti@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] recipe: u-boot: update recipe for more images X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 20:27:07 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/26/2013 03:13 PM, Hernandez, Carlos wrote: >> I haven't seen the keystone patches yet, so I don't know if the GPH >> image is "special" in terms of headers, but the build target >> u-boot-with-spl.bin is the canonical build target for "put >> u-boot-spl.bin and u-boot.bin together". >> > > The current test script transfers (via UART) u-boot-spl.bin and then u-boot.img. > Have anybody tried booting one omap or sitara device using 'u-boot-with-spl.bin' image. No, because none of the boot modes that take u-boot-spl.bin would like to see a concatenated image like that. That build target is primarily used on other (vendors) platforms. -- Tom