From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from devils.ext.ti.com (devils.ext.ti.com [198.47.26.153]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2DC2E0027C for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 12:38:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from dlelxv30.itg.ti.com ([172.17.2.17]) by devils.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id r1QKc3wG025540 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:38:03 -0600 Received: from DFLE72.ent.ti.com (dfle72.ent.ti.com [128.247.5.109]) by dlelxv30.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r1QKc3Ei016884 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:38:03 -0600 Received: from dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (172.17.1.197) by dfle72.ent.ti.com (128.247.5.109) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:38:03 -0600 Received: from [158.218.103.10] (a0850405-off1.am.dhcp.ti.com [158.218.103.10]) by dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r1QKc3wb015547; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:38:03 -0600 Message-ID: <512D1D2B.7080909@ti.com> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 15:38:03 -0500 From: Carlos Hernandez User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Rini References: <1361903920-16650-1-git-send-email-m-karicheri2@ti.com> <512D0217.7090100@ti.com> <20130226192023.GL6725@denix.org> <512D0D9F.8050705@ti.com> <512D12D0.7090804@ti.com> <512D1714.6040805@ti.com> <512D1A7F.7030806@ti.com> In-Reply-To: <512D1A7F.7030806@ti.com> Cc: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] recipe: u-boot: update recipe for more images X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 20:38:05 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/26/2013 03:26 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On 02/26/2013 03:12 PM, Cyril Chemparathy wrote: >> On 02/26/2013 02:53 PM, Murali Karicheri wrote: >>> + Cyril, >>> >>> Cyril had worked on adding GPH format for u-boot. Want to hear from him >>> why not used the u-boot-with-spl.bin build target. >>> >> Because u-boot-with-spl.bin does not wrap the spl image with a header >> that the rom bootloader understands. > What is the header we need? I assume it's not compatible with our > previous headers. And if it's just a convenience for programming the > flash, maybe we just stick with two files, to avoid further headaches > upstream? It's a general rule that concatenating files would make > programming easier, but it's a small savings on either end, yes? This > would also make the packaging easier since it would just be > SPL_IMAGE_FILE (or whatever) set to u-boot-spl.gph and so forth. Thanks! > I believe this is what the patch I submitted (to meta-arago) few days ago do. You need to define SPL_UART_BINARY in your recipe to enable the extra do_install and do_deploy functionality.