From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Amos Jeffries Subject: Re: Help on error message Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 21:43:31 +1300 Message-ID: <512F18B3.6050004@treenet.co.nz> References: <512E49C8.30602@cats-muvva.net> <512E6AF4.40008@cats-muvva.net> <512EA15C.2080800@googlemail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Mr Dash Four Return-path: Received: from ip-58-28-153-233.static-xdsl.xnet.co.nz ([58.28.153.233]:50745 "EHLO treenet.co.nz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754231Ab3B1Ixq (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2013 03:53:46 -0500 In-Reply-To: <512EA15C.2080800@googlemail.com> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 28/02/2013 1:14 p.m., Mr Dash Four wrote: > >> I've been reading Linus Torval's latest rants, so I don't feel >> confident enough about my own code to subject it to the cold scrutiny >> of this list. > Rants? What rants? Have I missed something? I know Linus doesn't mince > his words (good on him!), particularly when it comes to Gnome 3 and > SUSE (which I fully agree with, on both counts), but I wasn't aware of > any new ones. Care to enlighten me? Topic of the week seems to be some rather nasty UEFI hacks being added to the X.509 systems: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/1682804?do=post_view_threaded#1682804 The submitter was already turned down by Rusty the intermediary maintainer and it got bumped up to Linus. The media are blowing the small amount of horror/exasperation into a "rant". NP: had to link the mirror due to load on the mailing lists main server for some reason ;-) AYJ