All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marian Csontos <mcsontos@redhat.com>
To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Cc: MOLLE Thomas <t.molle@neopost.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] raid1 Failed to activate new LV
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 15:26:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <512F6909.2060005@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0926B8B0C4D4424CAE1FCE69BD50CB2F0854CA38@s02008.neopost.grp>

On 02/28/2013 02:59 PM, MOLLE Thomas wrote:
> "lvcreate -vvv --type raid1 -m 1 -L 557G -n lv0 vg0" returns about 2000
> rows.
> Do you know what I could look?
>
> Kernel : 2.6.39-300.28.1.el6uek.x86_64

I wonder whether unbreakable kernel is binary compatible with 6.3 
userspace? :-/

I am not going to dig deeper into their problems. Sorry.

-- Marian

> # dmsetup targets
> raid             v1.0.0
> multipath        v1.3.0
> mirror           v1.12.1
> striped          v1.4.0
> linear           v1.1.0
> error            v1.0.1
>
> Following some quotes of the lvcreate -vvvv :
>
> Setting dmeventd/snapshot_library to libdevmapper-event-lvm2snapshot.so
> Initialised segtype: snapshot
>   Setting dmeventd/mirror_library to libdevmapper-event-lvm2mirror.so
> Initialised segtype: mirror
> dmeventd/raid_library not found in config: defaulting to
> libdevmapper-event-lvm2raid.so
> Initialised segtype: raid1
> dmeventd/raid_library not found in config: defaulting to
> libdevmapper-event-lvm2raid.so
> Initialised segtype: raid4
> ...
> #lvmcmdline.c:1070         Processing: lvcreate -vvvv --type raid1 -m 1
> -L 557G -n lv0 vg0
> #lvmcmdline.c:1073         O_DIRECT will be used
> ...
> #libdm-config.c:758       Setting global/mirror_segtype_default to
> mirror
> ...
> #filters/filter-composite.c:31         Using /dev/mapper/mpathd
> #device/dev-io.c:524         Opened /dev/mapper/mpathd RO O_DIRECT
> #device/dev-io.c:137         /dev/mapper/mpathd: block size is 4096
> bytes
> #label/label.c:156       /dev/mapper/mpathd: lvm2 label detected at
> sector 1
> #cache/lvmcache.c:1337         lvmcache: /dev/mapper/mpathd: now in VG
> #orphans_lvm2 (#orphans_lvm2) with 0 mdas
> #format_text/format-text.c:1192         /dev/mapper/mpathd: Found
> metadata at 178176 size 955 (in area at 4096 size 1044480) for vg0
> (k7hTZD-QXLt-LO34-Fc5P-vk5T-zcOL-2JgZmr)
> #cache/lvmcache.c:1337         lvmcache: /dev/mapper/mpathd: now in VG
> vg0 with 1 mdas
> #cache/lvmcache.c:1114         lvmcache: /dev/mapper/mpathd: setting vg0
> VGID to k7hTZDQXLtLO34Fc5Pvk5TzcOL2JgZmr
> #cache/lvmcache.c:1374         lvmcache: /dev/mapper/mpathd: VG vg0: Set
> creation host to mrs
> ...
> #format_text/archiver.c:131     Archiving volume group "vg0" metadata
> (seqno 75).
> #metadata/lv_manip.c:3062     Creating logical volume lv0
> #metadata/lv_manip.c:2657       Extending segment type, raid1
> #metadata/pv_map.c:55         Allowing allocation on /dev/mapper/mpathb
> start PE 0 length 142794
> #metadata/pv_map.c:55         Allowing allocation on /dev/mapper/mpathd
> start PE 0 length 142794
> #metadata/lv_manip.c:2072         Trying allocation using contiguous
> policy.
> #metadata/lv_manip.c:1684         Still need 285186 total extents:
> #metadata/lv_manip.c:1687           2 (2 data/0 parity) parallel areas
> of 142592 extents each
> #metadata/lv_manip.c:1689           2 RAID metadata areas of 1 extents
> each
> #metadata/lv_manip.c:1378         Considering allocation area 0 as
> /dev/mapper/mpathb start PE 0 length 142593 leaving 201.
> #metadata/lv_manip.c:1378         Considering allocation area 1 as
> /dev/mapper/mpathd start PE 0 length 142593 leaving 201.
> #metadata/lv_manip.c:1859         Sorting 2 areas
> #metadata/lv_manip.c:1145         Allocating parallel metadata area 0 on
> /dev/mapper/mpathb start PE 0 length 1.
> #metadata/lv_manip.c:1161         Allocating parallel area 0 on
> /dev/mapper/mpathb start PE 1 length 142592.
> #metadata/lv_manip.c:1145         Allocating parallel metadata area 1 on
> /dev/mapper/mpathd start PE 0 length 1.
> #metadata/lv_manip.c:1161         Allocating parallel area 1 on
> /dev/mapper/mpathd start PE 1 length 142592.
> #metadata/lv_manip.c:3062     Creating logical volume lv0_rimage_0
> #metadata/lv_manip.c:455       Stack lv0:0[0] on LV lv0_rimage_0:0
> ...
> #metadata/lv_manip.c:3214         LV lv0_rmeta_0 in VG vg0 is now
> visible.
> #metadata/lv_manip.c:3214         LV lv0_rmeta_1 in VG vg0 is now
> visible.
> ...
> #libdm-deptree.c:1790     Creating vg0-lv0
> #ioctl/libdm-iface.c:1687         dm create vg0-lv0
> LVM-k7hTZDQXLtLO34Fc5Pvk5TzcOL2JgZmrOeQEzBa3uGtAlpCbyKktcBT9InlochY4 NF
> [16384] (*1)
> #libdm-deptree.c:2329     Loading vg0-lv0 table (252:8)
> #libdm-deptree.c:2273         Adding target to (252:8): 0 1168113664
> raid raid1 3 0 region_size 1024 2 252:4 252:5 252:6 252:7
> #ioctl/libdm-iface.c:1687         dm table   (252:8) OF   [16384] (*1)
> #ioctl/libdm-iface.c:1687         dm reload   (252:8) NF   [16384] (*1)
> #ioctl/libdm-iface.c:1705   device-mapper: reload ioctl on  failed:
> Invalid argument
> #libdm-deptree.c:2425         <backtrace>
> #activate/dev_manager.c:2198         <backtrace>
> #activate/dev_manager.c:2232         <backtrace>
> #activate/activate.c:875         <backtrace>
> #activate/activate.c:1849         <backtrace>
> #mm/memlock.c:412         Leaving critical section (activated).
> #metadata/vg.c:74         Freeing VG vg0 at 0x22197d0.
> #activate/activate.c:1881         <backtrace>
> #locking/locking.c:396         <backtrace>
> #locking/locking.c:466         <backtrace>
> #metadata/lv_manip.c:4525   Failed to activate new LV.
>
>
>
>
>
> On 02/28/2013 10:32 AM, MOLLE Thomas wrote:
>> kernel: lvcreate: sending ioctl 1261 to a partition!
>> kernel: device-mapper: table: 252:8: raid: Unrecognised raid_type
>> kernel: device-mapper: ioctl: error adding target to table
>
> Hi, looking at RHEL6.3 kernel code there must be a corruption or
> incompatibility somewhere between command line and kernel and raid1
> should definitely be recognized.
>
> Could you first try running the `lvcreate` command with `-vvvv`, please?
>
> I see the lvm2 package is fairly recent. What about kernel? What do
> `uname -a` and `dmsetup targets` say?
>
> -- Marian
>
>>
>> I do not understand why the type is not recognized
>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 05:45:02PM +0100, MOLLE Thomas wrote:
>>> # device-mapper: reload ioctl on failed: Invalid argument # Failed to
>
>>> activate new LV.
>>>
>>> Look in your kernel message log for a more detailed error message.
>>>
>>> Alasdair
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-lvm mailing list
>> linux-lvm@redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
>> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-28 14:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-27 16:45 [linux-lvm] raid1 Failed to activate new LV MOLLE Thomas
2013-02-27 18:12 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2013-02-28  9:32   ` MOLLE Thomas
2013-02-28 13:23     ` Marian Csontos
2013-02-28 13:59       ` MOLLE Thomas
2013-02-28 14:26         ` Marian Csontos [this message]
2013-04-15 21:16         ` Brassow Jonathan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=512F6909.2060005@redhat.com \
    --to=mcsontos@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
    --cc=t.molle@neopost.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.