From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
To: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
ML netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: e1000e broken after resume on x230 [was: Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 2c on CPU 0.]
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 13:51:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5130A43C.9040207@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <511DF7B4.8060504@openvz.org>
On 02/15/2013 09:54 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:17:46AM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>> It's pretty late for v3.8, but let me know if you think they're
>>> critical.
>>
>> Ok, I meant those:
>>
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=135984592927219
>>
>> They fix the link detection issue on my x230. So let's see. The first
>> one is:
>>
>> * https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2001211/ (e1000e: fix pci device
>> enable
>> counter balance)
>
> please use this instead:
Hi, I am a bit confused. Is this fixed in -next yet? And if so, is it
known which commit IDs are needed to fix the issue in 3.7 (see below)?
> [PATCH v2 1/7] e1000e: fix pci-device enable-counter balance
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/4/190
>
> from v2 patchset: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/4/185
So this is now in -next as:
commit e34f7147d93afe5efc574734bbff6584c0cc4a02
Author: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>
Date: Mon Feb 25 09:19:04 2013 +0400
e1000e: fix pci-device enable-counter balance
>> I don't see that one in your tree.
>>
>> * pci-pm-clear-state_saved-during-suspend.patch
This is:
commit 82fee4d67ab86d6fe5eb0f9a9e988ca9d654d765
Author: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Date: Mon Feb 4 15:56:05 2013 +0400
PCI/PM: Clear state_saved during suspend
>> Rafael said this one is a real bugfix. Looks like e1000e maintainers are
>> picking that one?
>>
>> * pci-pm-fix-e1000e-runtime-suspend.patch
Is this one replaced by a different fix in the end? Which one? I don't
think it is in -next yet, right?
confused,
--
js
suse labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-01 12:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-29 20:28 Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 2c on CPU 0 Borislav Petkov
2013-01-29 21:32 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-30 3:42 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-30 17:27 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-30 17:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-30 19:43 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-01-30 20:00 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-30 20:33 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-01-30 21:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-30 22:17 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-01-30 22:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-30 23:12 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-01-30 23:47 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-01-31 0:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-31 7:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-31 8:14 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-01-31 13:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-31 13:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-02 23:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-03 14:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-03 20:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-03 20:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-03 21:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-03 21:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-14 14:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-14 17:17 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-02-14 19:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-15 8:54 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2013-02-15 9:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-03-04 21:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-03-05 0:16 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-03-05 9:42 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-03-05 9:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-03-05 10:01 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-03-05 10:02 ` Jeff Kirsher
2013-03-05 10:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-03-05 10:29 ` Jeff Kirsher
2013-03-05 11:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-03-05 11:33 ` Jeff Kirsher
2013-03-05 11:42 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-03-06 0:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-03-06 0:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-03-08 16:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-03-05 10:01 ` Jeff Kirsher
2013-03-05 10:04 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-03-01 12:51 ` Jiri Slaby [this message]
2013-02-06 13:54 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-02-06 21:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-31 8:28 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-01-31 13:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-31 13:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-03-01 12:55 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-04-04 7:32 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-04-04 9:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-04 9:38 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-04-04 9:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-31 13:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-03 21:29 ` Jiri Slaby
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5130A43C.9040207@suse.cz \
--to=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=khlebnikov@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.