From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH] credit1: Use atomic bit operations for the flags structure Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 11:42:19 +0000 Message-ID: <5134889B.4080700@eu.citrix.com> References: <1361975376-27913-1-git-send-email-george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> <513496C902000078000C2C7A@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <513496C902000078000C2C7A@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: "Keir (Xen.org)" , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 04/03/13 11:42, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 04.03.13 at 12:06, George Dunlap wrote: >> Ping? > I could ack it, but wouldn't be permitted to commit without Keir's ack, > so it's all left to him... Same for the two credit2 patches of yours (I > reckon the resend today doesn't really have any changes over what > you had sent last week). Is that how it works? I thought the main point was just that everything has to have a suitable ack, and not even committers can ack their own stuff; so my SoB + your ack should be sufficient. That seems to be how IanC and IanJ do stuff. You are correct regarding the credit2 patches -- I resent them because the first batch I sent last week had a mistake, and I wasn't sure the second batch (with the fix) was distinguishable if someone got a bit confused. So I thought it safest to send another copy explicitly with "v3". -George