From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH] SEDF: avoid gathering vCPU-s on pCPU0 Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 12:15:54 +0000 Message-ID: <5134907A.4020203@eu.citrix.com> References: <5130D8D002000078000C26C6@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <5134959502000078000C2C60@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <51348F76.3090204@eu.citrix.com> <5134A04802000078000C2CD3@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5134A04802000078000C2CD3@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 04/03/13 12:23, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 04.03.13 at 13:11, George Dunlap wrote: >> It's probably not a bad idea to just extend that idea to all the >> schedulers really. It's not like we expect people to be changing the >> affinity masks hundreds of times a second. > Yeah, why not - would (minimally) reduce code size and remove the > SEDF-specific check from the generic scheduler code again. I'll whip up a patch... -G > > Jan >