From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37973)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <sw@weilnetz.de>) id 1UCc0f-0001iX-EG
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 15:29:22 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <sw@weilnetz.de>) id 1UCc0d-0005rF-3z
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 15:29:21 -0500
Received: from v220110690675601.yourvserver.net ([78.47.199.172]:41063)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <sw@weilnetz.de>) id 1UCc0c-0005qt-To
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 15:29:19 -0500
Message-ID: <51350411.5040103@weilnetz.de>
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 21:29:05 +0100
From: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <51293E4A.1040100@weilnetz.de>
	<20130304163731.GA23040@ohm.aurel32.net>
In-Reply-To: <20130304163731.GA23040@ohm.aurel32.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] TCG assertion with qemu-system-mipsel
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Aur=E9lien_Jarno?= <aurelien@aurel32.net>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>

Am 04.03.2013 17:37, schrieb Aur=E9lien Jarno:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 11:10:18PM +0100, Stefan Weil wrote:
>> This assertion occured with latest git master:
>>
>> qemu-system-mipsel: /src/qemu/tcg/tcg-op.h:2589:
>>  tcg_gen_goto_tb: Assertion `(tcg_ctx.goto_tb_issue_mask & (1 << idx))
>> =3D=3D 0' failed.
>> Aborted
>>
>> QEMU was built with --enable-debug and running a Debian MIPS Lenny (NF=
S
>> root).
>> The assertion happened when running "apt-get update" in the guest.
>>
> Is it something reproductible or more or less random? Have you Cc:ed
> Richard because it's related to the latest patches?
>
> On my side I am experiencing random segfaults in various guests (at
> least PowerPC, MIPS, SH4 and ARM). I have found a way to bisect it, eve=
n
> if it is quite long (building Perl + the testsuite). Currently I know
> that 1.3 is affected, while 1.2 is not.

Hi,

either it is fixed now or it is not reproducible:

I tried it twice on Feb. 23 and got the same assertion in both cases,
but now I tried it with the current git master and had no problem.
Sorry that I cannot run more tests or a bisect - I'm currently rather
busy with other work.

Stefan