From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chegu Vinod Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] kvm: Record the preemption status of vcpus using preempt notifiers Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 07:19:41 -0800 Message-ID: <51360D0D.5020609@hp.com> References: <20130304180146.31281.33540.sendpatchset@codeblue.in.ibm.com> <20130304180206.31281.67229.sendpatchset@codeblue.in.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Avi Kivity , Gleb Natapov , Ingo Molnar , Marcelo Tosatti , Rik van Riel , Srikar , "H. Peter Anvin" , "Nikunj A. Dadhania" , KVM , Thomas Gleixner , Jiannan Ouyang , "Andrew M. Theurer" , LKML , Srivatsa Vaddagiri , Andrew Jones To: Raghavendra K T Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130304180206.31281.67229.sendpatchset@codeblue.in.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 3/4/2013 10:02 AM, Raghavendra K T wrote: > From: Raghavendra K T > > Note that we mark as preempted only when vcpu's task state was > Running during preemption. > > Thanks Jiannan, Avi for preemption notifier ideas. Thanks Gleb, PeterZ > for their precious suggestions. Thanks Srikar for an idea on avoiding > rcu lock while checking task state that improved overcommit numbers. > > Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T > --- > include/linux/kvm_host.h | 1 + > virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 5 +++++ > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h > index cad77fe..0b31e1c 100644 > --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h > +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h > @@ -252,6 +252,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu { > bool dy_eligible; > } spin_loop; > #endif > + bool preempted; > struct kvm_vcpu_arch arch; > }; > > diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c > index adc68fe..83a804c 100644 > --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c > +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c > @@ -244,6 +244,7 @@ int kvm_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm *kvm, unsigned id) > > kvm_vcpu_set_in_spin_loop(vcpu, false); > kvm_vcpu_set_dy_eligible(vcpu, false); > + vcpu->preempted = false; > > r = kvm_arch_vcpu_init(vcpu); > if (r < 0) > @@ -2902,6 +2903,8 @@ struct kvm_vcpu *preempt_notifier_to_vcpu(struct preempt_notifier *pn) > static void kvm_sched_in(struct preempt_notifier *pn, int cpu) > { > struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = preempt_notifier_to_vcpu(pn); > + if (vcpu->preempted) > + vcpu->preempted = false; > > kvm_arch_vcpu_load(vcpu, cpu); > } > @@ -2911,6 +2914,8 @@ static void kvm_sched_out(struct preempt_notifier *pn, > { > struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = preempt_notifier_to_vcpu(pn); > > + if (current->state == TASK_RUNNING) > + vcpu->preempted = true; > kvm_arch_vcpu_put(vcpu); > } > > > . > Reviewed-by: Chegu Vinod