From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnout Vandecappelle Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 08:52:36 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] What to do about systemd/udev/eudev? In-Reply-To: <20130305195514.14ba14fd@skate> References: <1362312574-17701-1-git-send-email-olivier.schonken@gmail.com> <20130303195436.49654719@skate> <948441.33302.bm@smtp138.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <51359378.3010307@mind.be> <20130305195514.14ba14fd@skate> Message-ID: <5136F5C4.6070300@mind.be> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 03/05/13 19:55, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Dear Arnout Vandecappelle, > > On Tue, 05 Mar 2013 07:40:56 +0100, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: > >> And this is exactly what Olivier Schonken's patch does, right? For >> systemd init systems, systemd's udev is used; for other init systems, the >> old udev 17 is used. > > udev 17 ? I guess you mean 182, right? > > Sure that's what Olivier Schonken's patch does. But how compatible are > the libudev from the modern udev bundled with systemd, and the old udev? > > Also, Olivier's patch doesn't update all the packages that depend on > udev so that they can either depend on the old udev, or systemd. Yes, that's what Olivier's patch does: packages that depend on udev will use the old udev, not the systemd udev. Hm, just now I realized that that means that you get two udevs when using systemd... OK, so this is not really the way to go :-( Regards, Arnout -- Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F