From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55236) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDJ3Y-0002Iw-QP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 13:27:16 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDJ3U-0001Cy-0K for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 13:27:12 -0500 Received: from ssl.dlhnet.de ([91.198.192.8]:60931 helo=ssl.dlh.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UDJ3T-0001Cn-QS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 13:27:07 -0500 Message-ID: <51378A7A.1060208@dlhnet.de> Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 19:27:06 +0100 From: Peter Lieven MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <51378200.5010705@dlhnet.de> <513785A0.1010001@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <513785A0.1010001@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/7] block: only force IO completion in .bdrv_truncate if we are shrinking List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, sw@weilnetz.de, Jeff Cody , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com Am 06.03.2013 19:06, schrieb Paolo Bonzini: > Il 06/03/2013 18:50, Peter Lieven ha scritto: >>>> Commit 9a665b2b made bdrv_truncate() call bdrv_drain_all(), but this breaks >>>> QCOW images, as well other future image formats (such as VHDX) that may call >>>> bdrv_truncate(bs->file) from within a read/write operation. For example, QCOW >>>> will cause an assert, due to tracked_requests not being empty (since the >>>> read/write that called bdrv_truncate() is still in progress). > > I'm not sure such bdrv_truncate calls are necessary. QCOW2 doesn't have > them (almost; there is one in qcow2_write_compressed, I'm not even sure > that one is necessary though), and I think QCOW's breaks using it with a > block device as a backing file. I think we have to check the sense of bs->growable nevertheless. It is set to 1 for all drivers which can't be right?! int bdrv_file_open(BlockDriverState **pbs, const char *filename, int flags) { BlockDriverState *bs; BlockDriver *drv; int ret; drv = bdrv_find_protocol(filename); if (!drv) { return -ENOENT; } bs = bdrv_new(""); ret = bdrv_open_common(bs, NULL, filename, flags, drv); if (ret < 0) { bdrv_delete(bs); return ret; } bs->growable = 1; *pbs = bs; return 0; } I think each driver should set it accordingly on its own. Peter > > Paolo >