From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: OpenStack summit : Ceph design session Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 23:45:50 +0100 Message-ID: <5137C71E.5090507@dachary.org> References: <51289AF2.9010509@dachary.org> <512A9F5F.7080706@inktank.com> <512B3725.4040602@dachary.org> <513319E8.7000105@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig1CA9D2B3A4D72C1AF5B35E66" Return-path: Received: from smtp.dmail.dachary.org ([86.65.39.20]:36306 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752838Ab3CFWpz (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Mar 2013 17:45:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Neil Levine Cc: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig1CA9D2B3A4D72C1AF5B35E66 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Neil, On 03/06/2013 08:27 PM, Neil Levine wrote: > I think the multi-site RGW stuff is somewhat orthogonal to OpenStack Even when keystone is involved ? > where as the RBD backups needs to factor in Horizon, Cinder APIs and > where the logic for managing the backups sits. >=20 > Ross is looking to get a wiki setup for Ceph blueprints so we can > document the incremental snapshot stuff and then use this as a basis > for creating the OpenStack blueprint. Great. > Who approves the session at ODS and when is this decision made? I suspect Josh knows more than I do about this. During the cinder meeting= earlier today J. Griffith said that if the nova track is too busy to hos= t the "Roadmap for Ceph integration with OpenStack" session he was in fav= or of having it in the cinder track. Following his advice I suggested to = Thierry Carrez to open a "Cross project" track ( http://lists.openstack.o= rg/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-March/006365.html )=20 Cheers > Neil >=20 > On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Loic Dachary wrote: >> Hi Neil, >> >> I've updated http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/details/38 with the Geogr= aphic DR related threads >> >> Geo-replication with RADOS GW http://marc.info/?l=3Dceph-devel&m=3D= 135939566407623&w=3D4 >> Geographic DR for RGW http://marc.info/?l=3Dceph-devel&m=3D1361914= 79931880&w=3D4 >> >> I'm increasingly interested in figuring out how it fits with OpenStack= =2E >> >> Cheers >> >> On 02/25/2013 11:04 AM, Loic Dachary wrote: >>> Hi Neil, >>> >>> I've added "RBD backups secondary clusters within Openstack" to the l= ist of blueprints. Do you have links to mail threads / chat logs related = to this topic ? >>> >>> I moved the content of the session to an etherpad for collaborative e= diting >>> >>> https://etherpad.openstack.org/roadmap-for-ceph-integration-with-open= stack >>> >>> and it is now linked from >>> >>> http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/details/38 >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> On 02/25/2013 07:12 AM, Neil Levine wrote: >>>> Thanks for taking the lead on this Loic. >>>> >>>> As a blueprint, I'd like to look at RBD backups to secondary cluster= s >>>> within Openstack. Nick Barcet and others have mentioned ideas for th= is >>>> now that Cinder is multi-cluster aware. >>>> >>>> Neil >>>> >>>> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Josh Durgin wrote: >>>>> On 02/23/2013 02:33 AM, Loic Dachary wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> In anticipation of the next OpenStack summit >>>>>> http://www.openstack.org/summit/portland-2013/, I proposed a sessi= on to >>>>>> discuss OpenStack and Ceph integration. Our meeting during FOSDEM = earlier >>>>>> this month was a great experience although it was planned at the l= ast >>>>>> minute. I hope we can organize something even better for the summi= t. >>>>>> >>>>>> For developers and contributors to both Ceph and OpenStack such as= myself, >>>>>> it would be a great opportunity to figure out a sensible roadmap f= or the >>>>>> next six months. I realize this roadmap is already clear for Josh = Durgin and >>>>>> other Ceph / OpenStack developers who are passionately invested in= both >>>>>> projects for a long time. However I am new to both projects and su= ch a >>>>>> session would be a precious guide and highly motivating. >>>>>> >>>>>> http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/details/38 >>>>>> >>>>>> What do you think ? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Sounds like a great idea! >>>>> Thanks for putting together the session! >>>>> >>>>> Josh >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-deve= l" in >>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >>> >> >> -- >> Lo=EFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >> --=20 Lo=EFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --------------enig1CA9D2B3A4D72C1AF5B35E66 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlE3xx4ACgkQ8dLMyEl6F20rcQCfVUSXet3LmdNOeUyWbGnAPjhE V6YAoL2y7INRRA8EWOwf8YP+KYTa6344 =OZWC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig1CA9D2B3A4D72C1AF5B35E66--