From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: OpenStack summit : Ceph design session Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 23:21:36 +0100 Message-ID: <513912F0.80402@dachary.org> References: <51289AF2.9010509@dachary.org> <512A9F5F.7080706@inktank.com> <512B3725.4040602@dachary.org> <513319E8.7000105@dachary.org> <5137C71E.5090507@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig7E9D51FC71C1ADC186A07C95" Return-path: Received: from smtp.dmail.dachary.org ([86.65.39.20]:41009 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753822Ab3CGWVj (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Mar 2013 17:21:39 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Yehuda Sadeh Cc: Neil Levine , Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig7E9D51FC71C1ADC186A07C95 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Yehuda, I'm not sure if one keystone for all zones would be better than one keyst= one per zone. If you think it's worth discussing during the OpenStack sum= mit and you create a session http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/create in th= e keystone track, I will definitely attend :-). Or I can do it if you lik= e. But there is no way to share the edit permissions. Cheers On 03/07/2013 12:12 AM, Yehuda Sadeh wrote: > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Neil Levine w= rote: >> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:= >>> Hi Neil, >>> >>> On 03/06/2013 08:27 PM, Neil Levine wrote: >>>> I think the multi-site RGW stuff is somewhat orthogonal to OpenStack= >>> >>> Even when keystone is involved ? >> >> Good question. >> >> Yehuda: how would the asynchronously replicated user metadata interact= >> with Keystone? >=20 > Depends. Are there any special requirements? From what I understand, > you'd define the keystone backend every zone interact with per-zone, > and the fact that it's a replicated region/zone doesn't change much. >=20 >> >>>> Who approves the session at ODS and when is this decision made? >>> >>> I suspect Josh knows more than I do about this. During the cinder mee= ting earlier today J. Griffith said that if the nova track is too busy to= host the "Roadmap for Ceph integration with OpenStack" session he was in= favor of having it in the cinder track. Following his advice I suggested= to Thierry Carrez to open a "Cross project" track ( http://lists.opensta= ck.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-March/006365.html ) >> >> I don't think Cinder is such a bad place for it to be as presumably >> the interaction to copy the block device to a secondary location would= >> be triggered through a Cinder API call no? >> >> Neil >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" = in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" i= n > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html --=20 Lo=EFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --------------enig7E9D51FC71C1ADC186A07C95 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlE5EvAACgkQ8dLMyEl6F20v9ACfWmIJuXSpJ/5MVEluxz+J0rQr /ukAnRUyWPIYkS63tVury6nJI/Dnf3WA =jBg/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig7E9D51FC71C1ADC186A07C95--