From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=E9?= Subject: Re: 4.2.1: Poor write performance for DomU. Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 10:43:24 +0100 Message-ID: <5139B2BC.50608@citrix.com> References: <51243089.8020307@crc.id.au> <512488AC.1020702@citrix.com> <51248E23.7060408@crc.id.au> <51249C11.3050800@crc.id.au> <5139A747.80703@crc.id.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5139A747.80703@crc.id.au> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Steven Haigh Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 08/03/13 09:54, Steven Haigh wrote: > Just wondering if there is any further news or tests that I might be > able to do on this? I have been working on speed improvements for blkfront/blkback, and submitted the first RFC series of patches last week, which can be found at http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1448584. This is still a WIP, so if you want to test them please be aware there might be hidden bugs. I've also pushed them to a branch in my git repo: git://xenbits.xen.org/people/royger/linux.git xen-block-indirect You will need to recompile both the Dom0/DomU kernels (if they are not the same) if you want to test them.