From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3 linux-next] cpufreq: conservative: Use an inline function
 to evaluate freq_target
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 18:21:05 +0200
Message-ID: <513E0471.6@semaphore.gr>
References: <51366C77.3080309@semaphore.gr> <CAKohpokdG2vd5Cp4Lmcnc5ZrLsa-_4Kcy-DvLjG--6SMVsGZkg@mail.gmail.com> <51374F8D.9040300@semaphore.gr> <CAKohponZrMyZkUBDAnMv=B+fVpqYdQ62bP2iQGsg1=uOKfyPdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAKohponZrMyZkUBDAnMv=B+fVpqYdQ62bP2iQGsg1=uOKfyPdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <cpufreq.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> On 6 March 2013 22:15, Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr> wrote:
>> Use an inline function to evaluate freq_target to avoid duplicate code.
>>
>> Also, define a macro for the default frequency step.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>
>> ---
>>   drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------
>>   1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

Hi Rafael,

Could you please let me know if this patchset is going to be 
applied or not?

Thank you in advance for your time,
Stratos