From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Blaine Subject: Re: Read speed Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:54:06 -0400 Message-ID: <513E1A3E.1080404@kickflop.net> References: <51105F16.8070603@kickflop.net> <51113D76.80609@kickflop.net> <20130205142058.7618dfcf@corrin.poochiereds.net> <20130205142307.58d87a21@corrin.poochiereds.net> <5111656C.90109@kickflop.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jeff Layton , Steve French , linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, sprabhu-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input) Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5111656C.90109-GbE5gUWZ6k7k1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-cifs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: [ suggestion by Jeff Layton to try to ensure that a modern ] [ kernel addresses the issues we were seeing over WAN links ] Just following up. * Fedora 18 CIFS-over-WAN read performance, as recorded with the same testing that was done previously, is ~3.4x that of RHEL 6.3 (or any common production distro running a pre-3.2 kernel). So yes, the work done to CIFS addresses our situation directly.