From: Cerrato Renaud <r.cerrato@til-technologies.fr>
To: barebox@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] AT91 UDC, fix recursive poll()
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 11:31:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51405596.8040000@til-technologies.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+7xNQ=XbCFAFrr1z+4rpDBirNHv7w_r+RZwGk-0x=G7Y=TBMA@mail.gmail.com>
Inlined patch below.
Signed-off-by: Cerrato Renaud <r.cerrato@til-technologies.fr>
---
drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c | 14 ++++++++------
drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c
index 0654038..8ae9119 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.c
@@ -1340,22 +1340,24 @@ int usb_gadget_poll(void)
struct at91_udc *udc = &controller;
u32 value;
- if (!udc->udp_baseaddr)
+ if (!udc->udp_baseaddr || udc->poll_lock)
return 0;
+ udc->poll_lock = 1;
+
value = gpio_get_value(udc->board.vbus_pin);
value ^= udc->board.vbus_active_low;
-
- if (!value) {
- at91_update_vbus(udc, value);
- return 0;
- }
at91_update_vbus(udc, value);
+ if (!value)
+ goto exit;
+
value = at91_udp_read(udc, AT91_UDP_ISR) & (~(AT91_UDP_SOFINT));
if (value)
at91_udc_irq(udc);
+exit:
+ udc->poll_lock = 0;
return value;
}
diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.h b/drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.h
index e592cc5..51145a9 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.h
+++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/at91_udc.h
@@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ struct at91_udc {
unsigned wait_for_config_ack:1;
unsigned selfpowered:1;
unsigned active_suspend:1;
+ unsigned poll_lock:1;
u8 addr;
u32 gpio_vbus_val;
struct at91_udc_data board;
--
1.7.2.5
On 12/03/2013 17:03, Renaud C. wrote:
> I noticed some weird behavior using DFU gadget on AT91SAM9260 which worked 1 of 10 times. The bug was due to the usb_gadget_poll() being called while the previous call was still in progress : some USB calls may takes a lot of time (ex : DFU erase-then-write), resulting in the poller to be triggered again while still in the poll() function.
>
> This patch adds a poll lock to the AT91 UDC driver.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> barebox mailing list
> barebox@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
_______________________________________________
barebox mailing list
barebox@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/barebox
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-13 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-12 16:03 [PATCH 4/7] AT91 UDC, fix recursive poll() Renaud C.
2013-03-13 10:31 ` Cerrato Renaud [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51405596.8040000@til-technologies.fr \
--to=r.cerrato@til-technologies.fr \
--cc=barebox@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.