All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfstests: btrfs tests for basic informational commands
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 11:17:46 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5140A6AA.2010204@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51409C25.70403@giantdisaster.de>

On 3/13/13 10:32 AM, Stefan Behrens wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 09:57:03 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> [...]
>> +echo "== Show device stats by mountpoint"
>> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG device stats $SCRATCH_MNT | _filter_btrfs_device_stats
> 
> Is the number of devices in SCRATCH_DEV_POOL fixed to 3? Otherwise you
> should pipe the device-stats-by-mountpoint through "head -10" to avoid
> failures if the number of devices is != 3.

Oh, you are right.

I had meant to filter device stats through "uniq" after replacing all
devices & numbers.  I'll add that, then I think it should be ok.

thanks for catching that.

> Possible additional checks (but I am not sure that we really need this
> additional level of detail in this check) would be:
> 1. The number of lines is 5 * number of devices.
> 2. The 5-line block that is printed for each device always looks the
> same (after applying _filter_btrfs_device_stats).

hm, perhaps - I wonder if that might be fragile?  I guess if *any* output
changes, the test will break . . . 

Thanks for the review!
-Eric

>> +echo "== Show device stats by first/scratch dev"
>> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG device stats $SCRATCH_DEV | _filter_btrfs_device_stats
>> +echo "== Show device stats by second dev"
>> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG device stats $FIRST_POOL_DEV | sed -e "s,$FIRST_POOL_DEV,FIRST_POOL_DEV,g"
>> +echo "== Show device stats by last dev"
>> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG device stats $LAST_POOL_DEV | sed -e "s,$LAST_POOL_DEV,LAST_POOL_DEV,g"
>> +
>> +# success, all done
>> +status=0
>> +exit
>> diff --git a/313.out b/313.out
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..1aa59a1
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/313.out
>> @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
>> +== QA output created by 313
>> +== Set filesystem label to TestLabel.313
>> +== Get filesystem label
>> +TestLabel.313
>> +== Mount.
>> +== Show filesystem by label
>> +Label: 'TestLabel.313'  uuid: <UUID>
>> +	Total devices <EXACTNUM> FS bytes used <SIZE>
>> +	devid     <DEVID> size <SIZE> used <SIZE> path SCRATCH_DEV
>> +
>> +== Show filesystem by UUID
>> +Label: 'TestLabel.313'  uuid: <EXACTUUID>
>> +	Total devices <EXACTNUM> FS bytes used <SIZE>
>> +	devid     <DEVID> size <SIZE> used <SIZE> path SCRATCH_DEV
>> +
>> +== Sync filesystem
>> +FSSync 'SCRATCH_MNT'
>> +== Show device stats by mountpoint
>> +[SCRATCH_DEV].write_io_errs   <NUM>
>> +[SCRATCH_DEV].read_io_errs    <NUM>
>> +[SCRATCH_DEV].flush_io_errs   <NUM>
>> +[SCRATCH_DEV].corruption_errs <NUM>
>> +[SCRATCH_DEV].generation_errs <NUM>
>> +[SCRATCH_DEV].write_io_errs   <NUM>
>> +[SCRATCH_DEV].read_io_errs    <NUM>
>> +[SCRATCH_DEV].flush_io_errs   <NUM>
>> +[SCRATCH_DEV].corruption_errs <NUM>
>> +[SCRATCH_DEV].generation_errs <NUM>
>> +[SCRATCH_DEV].write_io_errs   <NUM>
>> +[SCRATCH_DEV].read_io_errs    <NUM>
>> +[SCRATCH_DEV].flush_io_errs   <NUM>
>> +[SCRATCH_DEV].corruption_errs <NUM>
>> +[SCRATCH_DEV].generation_errs <NUM>
> 
> 3 devices in this case.

Yep, oops.

>> +== Show device stats by first/scratch dev
>> +[SCRATCH_DEV].write_io_errs   <NUM>
>> +[SCRATCH_DEV].read_io_errs    <NUM>
>> +[SCRATCH_DEV].flush_io_errs   <NUM>
>> +[SCRATCH_DEV].corruption_errs <NUM>
>> +[SCRATCH_DEV].generation_errs <NUM>
>> +== Show device stats by second dev
>> +[FIRST_POOL_DEV].write_io_errs   0
>> +[FIRST_POOL_DEV].read_io_errs    0
>> +[FIRST_POOL_DEV].flush_io_errs   0
>> +[FIRST_POOL_DEV].corruption_errs 0
>> +[FIRST_POOL_DEV].generation_errs 0
>> +== Show device stats by last dev
>> +[LAST_POOL_DEV].write_io_errs   0
>> +[LAST_POOL_DEV].read_io_errs    0
>> +[LAST_POOL_DEV].flush_io_errs   0
>> +[LAST_POOL_DEV].corruption_errs 0
>> +[LAST_POOL_DEV].generation_errs 0
> [...]
> 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfstests: btrfs tests for basic informational commands
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 11:17:46 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5140A6AA.2010204@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51409C25.70403@giantdisaster.de>

On 3/13/13 10:32 AM, Stefan Behrens wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 09:57:03 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> [...]
>> +echo "== Show device stats by mountpoint"
>> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG device stats $SCRATCH_MNT | _filter_btrfs_device_stats
> 
> Is the number of devices in SCRATCH_DEV_POOL fixed to 3? Otherwise you
> should pipe the device-stats-by-mountpoint through "head -10" to avoid
> failures if the number of devices is != 3.

Oh, you are right.

I had meant to filter device stats through "uniq" after replacing all
devices & numbers.  I'll add that, then I think it should be ok.

thanks for catching that.

> Possible additional checks (but I am not sure that we really need this
> additional level of detail in this check) would be:
> 1. The number of lines is 5 * number of devices.
> 2. The 5-line block that is printed for each device always looks the
> same (after applying _filter_btrfs_device_stats).

hm, perhaps - I wonder if that might be fragile?  I guess if *any* output
changes, the test will break . . . 

Thanks for the review!
-Eric

>> +echo "== Show device stats by first/scratch dev"
>> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG device stats $SCRATCH_DEV | _filter_btrfs_device_stats
>> +echo "== Show device stats by second dev"
>> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG device stats $FIRST_POOL_DEV | sed -e "s,$FIRST_POOL_DEV,FIRST_POOL_DEV,g"
>> +echo "== Show device stats by last dev"
>> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG device stats $LAST_POOL_DEV | sed -e "s,$LAST_POOL_DEV,LAST_POOL_DEV,g"
>> +
>> +# success, all done
>> +status=0
>> +exit
>> diff --git a/313.out b/313.out
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..1aa59a1
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/313.out
>> @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
>> +== QA output created by 313
>> +== Set filesystem label to TestLabel.313
>> +== Get filesystem label
>> +TestLabel.313
>> +== Mount.
>> +== Show filesystem by label
>> +Label: 'TestLabel.313'  uuid: <UUID>
>> +	Total devices <EXACTNUM> FS bytes used <SIZE>
>> +	devid     <DEVID> size <SIZE> used <SIZE> path SCRATCH_DEV
>> +
>> +== Show filesystem by UUID
>> +Label: 'TestLabel.313'  uuid: <EXACTUUID>
>> +	Total devices <EXACTNUM> FS bytes used <SIZE>
>> +	devid     <DEVID> size <SIZE> used <SIZE> path SCRATCH_DEV
>> +
>> +== Sync filesystem
>> +FSSync 'SCRATCH_MNT'
>> +== Show device stats by mountpoint
>> +[SCRATCH_DEV].write_io_errs   <NUM>
>> +[SCRATCH_DEV].read_io_errs    <NUM>
>> +[SCRATCH_DEV].flush_io_errs   <NUM>
>> +[SCRATCH_DEV].corruption_errs <NUM>
>> +[SCRATCH_DEV].generation_errs <NUM>
>> +[SCRATCH_DEV].write_io_errs   <NUM>
>> +[SCRATCH_DEV].read_io_errs    <NUM>
>> +[SCRATCH_DEV].flush_io_errs   <NUM>
>> +[SCRATCH_DEV].corruption_errs <NUM>
>> +[SCRATCH_DEV].generation_errs <NUM>
>> +[SCRATCH_DEV].write_io_errs   <NUM>
>> +[SCRATCH_DEV].read_io_errs    <NUM>
>> +[SCRATCH_DEV].flush_io_errs   <NUM>
>> +[SCRATCH_DEV].corruption_errs <NUM>
>> +[SCRATCH_DEV].generation_errs <NUM>
> 
> 3 devices in this case.

Yep, oops.

>> +== Show device stats by first/scratch dev
>> +[SCRATCH_DEV].write_io_errs   <NUM>
>> +[SCRATCH_DEV].read_io_errs    <NUM>
>> +[SCRATCH_DEV].flush_io_errs   <NUM>
>> +[SCRATCH_DEV].corruption_errs <NUM>
>> +[SCRATCH_DEV].generation_errs <NUM>
>> +== Show device stats by second dev
>> +[FIRST_POOL_DEV].write_io_errs   0
>> +[FIRST_POOL_DEV].read_io_errs    0
>> +[FIRST_POOL_DEV].flush_io_errs   0
>> +[FIRST_POOL_DEV].corruption_errs 0
>> +[FIRST_POOL_DEV].generation_errs 0
>> +== Show device stats by last dev
>> +[LAST_POOL_DEV].write_io_errs   0
>> +[LAST_POOL_DEV].read_io_errs    0
>> +[LAST_POOL_DEV].flush_io_errs   0
>> +[LAST_POOL_DEV].corruption_errs 0
>> +[LAST_POOL_DEV].generation_errs 0
> [...]
> 

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-13 16:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-13 14:57 [PATCH 0/3] xfstests patches Eric Sandeen
2013-03-13 14:57 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfstests: add 274 to the prealloc group Eric Sandeen
2013-03-13 17:36   ` Rich Johnston
2013-03-13 14:57 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfstests: keep newlines out of SCRATCH_DEV_POOL Eric Sandeen
2013-03-13 14:57   ` Eric Sandeen
2013-03-13 17:43   ` Rich Johnston
2013-03-13 17:43     ` Rich Johnston
2013-03-13 17:45     ` Eric Sandeen
2013-03-13 17:45       ` Eric Sandeen
2013-03-13 14:57 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfstests: btrfs tests for basic informational commands Eric Sandeen
2013-03-13 14:57   ` Eric Sandeen
2013-03-13 15:32   ` Stefan Behrens
2013-03-13 15:32     ` Stefan Behrens
2013-03-13 16:17     ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2013-03-13 16:17       ` Eric Sandeen
2013-03-13 17:47       ` Rich Johnston
2013-03-13 17:47         ` Rich Johnston
2013-03-13 16:38   ` [PATCH 3/3 V2] " Eric Sandeen
2013-03-13 16:38     ` Eric Sandeen
2013-03-13 18:53     ` [PATCH 3/3 V3] " Eric Sandeen
2013-03-13 18:53       ` Eric Sandeen
2013-03-13 19:00       ` Stefan Behrens
2013-03-13 19:00         ` Stefan Behrens
2013-03-13 19:01       ` [PATCH 3/3 V4] " Eric Sandeen
2013-03-13 19:01         ` Eric Sandeen
2013-03-14 13:01         ` Rich Johnston
2013-03-14 13:01           ` Rich Johnston
2013-03-14 13:35           ` Stefan Behrens
2013-03-14 13:35             ` Stefan Behrens
2013-03-15 10:16         ` Dave Chinner
2013-03-15 10:16           ` Dave Chinner
2013-03-15 13:46           ` Eric Sandeen
2013-03-15 13:46             ` Eric Sandeen
2013-03-15 14:23             ` Rich Johnston
2013-03-15 14:23               ` Rich Johnston
2013-03-15 14:36               ` Eric Sandeen
2013-03-15 14:36                 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-03-18 13:30                 ` Rich Johnston
2013-03-18 13:30                   ` Rich Johnston
2013-03-19 14:15                 ` Rich Johnston
2013-03-19 14:15                   ` Rich Johnston
2013-03-14 17:16 ` [PATCH 0/3] xfstests patches Rich Johnston
2013-03-15  5:43   ` Dave Chinner
2013-03-15 13:38     ` Rich Johnston

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5140A6AA.2010204@redhat.com \
    --to=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sbehrens@giantdisaster.de \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.