From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <5140EBB6.20205@xenomai.org> Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 22:12:22 +0100 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1362541011.90317.YahooMailNeo@web161401.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <51406EAA.5000303@xenomai.org> <514076BD.3020202@antcom.de> <201303131647.58842.leo@alaxarxa.net> In-Reply-To: <201303131647.58842.leo@alaxarxa.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Xenomai] about Xenomai in Debian and Ubuntu List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org On 03/13/2013 04:47 PM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > Hi, (I think that I always put Hi or Bones (in catalan ..), >=20 > I would like to put some comments to this thread: >=20 > > I really understand that you will take care of the debian directory of = the=20 > upstream code. Probably I misunderstand something reading your posts ..= =2E I=20 > understand Gilles mail. >=20 > I propose to have two branches in the upstream tree, one with the neces= sary=20 > stuff to create a kernel package for the debian stable tree (with their= =20 > kernel) and another for the sid/testing. This stuff could be the same o= f the=20 > official ones. Maybe some submodules or another hyper-special character= istic=20 > of git could help. >=20 > I don't understand your tone in your last mails. I think that it has be= en a=20 > misunderstanding problem. Please, _we_ can do it better. > >=20 > > Yes, I understand to St=C3=A9phane. However as I'm in several projects,= a lot of=20 > mails and to much things and a few time to do it. I have had the same f= eeling,=20 > but, well, maybe I begin to be a bit old and .... >=20 > I send to patch to UPSTREAM not to debian packagers. The script belongs= to=20 > upstream. I had a bad feeling because no answer to the patch, no push. = I had=20 > to insist because the stupid error. But, rereading the mail I think tha= t I=20 > post it in a wrong and confusing way: mea culpa. > Hi Leopold, Yes, there was a misunderstanding, but ultimately, I am the one who did the release, so, I could have tried to fix things. The truth is that I simply forgot the issue you reported. So, mea culpa. As for maintaing two debian directories, this is a bad idea, as long as we can make one which works for all releases, this is simply less work. So, let us keep it that way. Regards. --=20 Gilles.