From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Josh Durgin Subject: Re: OSD memory leaks? Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 17:15:31 -0700 Message-ID: <514116A3.5070803@inktank.com> References: <511505218.2097.1363219547568.JavaMail.root@optogenics.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-da0-f48.google.com ([209.85.210.48]:57186 "EHLO mail-da0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755630Ab3CNAQP (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Mar 2013 20:16:15 -0400 Received: by mail-da0-f48.google.com with SMTP id w4so640145dam.35 for ; Wed, 13 Mar 2013 17:16:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <511505218.2097.1363219547568.JavaMail.root@optogenics.com> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Dave Spano Cc: Greg Farnum , =?UTF-8?B?U8OpYmFzdGllbiBIYW4=?= , ceph-devel , Sage Weil , Wido den Hollander , Sylvain Munaut , Samuel Just , Vladislav Gorbunov On 03/13/2013 05:05 PM, Dave Spano wrote: > I renamed the old one from images to images-old, and the new one from images-new to images. This reminds me of a problem you might hit with this: RBD clones track the parent image pool by id, so they'll continue working after the pool is renamed. If you have any clones of the images-old pool, they'll stop working when that pool is deleted. To get around this, you'll need to flatten any clones whose parents are in images-old before deleting the images-old pool. Josh