From: holger.brunck@keymile.com (Holger Brunck)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] genirq: allow an alternative setup for the mask cache
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 11:43:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5142FB46.30609@keymile.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130314174559.GO21620@kw.sim.vm.gnt>
On 03/14/2013 06:45 PM, Simon Guinot wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 05:10:30PM +0100, Holger Brunck wrote:
>> The same interrupt mask cache (stored within struct irq_chip_generic)
>> is shared between all the irq_chip_type instances by default. But this
>> does not work on Orion SOCs which have separate mask registers for edge
>> and level interrupts. Therefore refactor the code that we always use a
>> pointer to access the mask register. By default it points to
>> gc->mask_cache for Orion SOCs it points to ct->mask_cache which is
>> setup in irq_setup_alt_chip().
>
> Thanks for patch. I was really willing to do it but you have been
> faster.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Holger Brunck <holger.brunck@keymile.com>
>
> You may add here:
>
> Reported-by: Joey Oravec <joravec@drewtech.com>
>
> Joey took some time to report and describe this bug.
>
ok will do.
>> ---
>> include/linux/irq.h | 3 +++
>> kernel/irq/generic-chip.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
>> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/irq.h b/include/linux/irq.h
>> index bc4e066..6bf2447 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/irq.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/irq.h
>> @@ -654,6 +654,7 @@ struct irq_chip_type {
>> struct irq_chip_regs regs;
>> irq_flow_handler_t handler;
>> u32 type;
>> + u32 mask_cache;
>> };
>>
>> /**
>> @@ -663,6 +664,7 @@ struct irq_chip_type {
>> * @irq_base: Interrupt base nr for this chip
>> * @irq_cnt: Number of interrupts handled by this chip
>> * @mask_cache: Cached mask register
>> + * @pmask_cache: pointer to cached mask register
>> * @type_cache: Cached type register
>> * @polarity_cache: Cached polarity register
>> * @wake_enabled: Interrupt can wakeup from suspend
>> @@ -684,6 +686,7 @@ struct irq_chip_generic {
>> unsigned int irq_base;
>> unsigned int irq_cnt;
>> u32 mask_cache;
>> + u32 *pmask_cache;
>> u32 type_cache;
>> u32 polarity_cache;
>> u32 wake_enabled;
>> diff --git a/kernel/irq/generic-chip.c b/kernel/irq/generic-chip.c
>> index c89295a..1be14a3 100644
>> --- a/kernel/irq/generic-chip.c
>> +++ b/kernel/irq/generic-chip.c
>> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ void irq_gc_mask_disable_reg(struct irq_data *d)
>>
>> irq_gc_lock(gc);
>> irq_reg_writel(mask, gc->reg_base + cur_regs(d)->disable);
>> - gc->mask_cache &= ~mask;
>> + *gc->pmask_cache &= ~mask;
>> irq_gc_unlock(gc);
>> }
>>
>> @@ -60,8 +60,8 @@ void irq_gc_mask_set_bit(struct irq_data *d)
>> u32 mask = 1 << (d->irq - gc->irq_base);
>>
>> irq_gc_lock(gc);
>> - gc->mask_cache |= mask;
>> - irq_reg_writel(gc->mask_cache, gc->reg_base + cur_regs(d)->mask);
>> + *gc->pmask_cache |= mask;
>> + irq_reg_writel(*gc->pmask_cache, gc->reg_base + cur_regs(d)->mask);
>> irq_gc_unlock(gc);
>> }
>>
>> @@ -78,8 +78,8 @@ void irq_gc_mask_clr_bit(struct irq_data *d)
>> u32 mask = 1 << (d->irq - gc->irq_base);
>>
>> irq_gc_lock(gc);
>> - gc->mask_cache &= ~mask;
>> - irq_reg_writel(gc->mask_cache, gc->reg_base + cur_regs(d)->mask);
>> + *gc->pmask_cache &= ~mask;
>> + irq_reg_writel(*gc->pmask_cache, gc->reg_base + cur_regs(d)->mask);
>> irq_gc_unlock(gc);
>> }
>> > @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ void irq_gc_unmask_enable_reg(struct irq_data *d)
>>
>> irq_gc_lock(gc);
>> irq_reg_writel(mask, gc->reg_base + cur_regs(d)->enable);
>> - gc->mask_cache |= mask;
>> + *gc->pmask_cache |= mask;
>> irq_gc_unlock(gc);
>> }
>>
>> @@ -243,9 +243,12 @@ void irq_setup_generic_chip(struct irq_chip_generic *gc, u32 msk,
>> list_add_tail(&gc->list, &gc_list);
>> raw_spin_unlock(&gc_lock);
>>
>> + /* Setup pointer to mask_cache */
>> + gc->pmask_cache = &gc->mask_cache;
>
> You need a flag here to choose between gc->mask_cache and
> ct->mask_cache.
>
hm, even here? Isn't it enough to do this if irq_setup_alt_chip is called?
>> +
>> /* Init mask cache ? */
>> if (flags & IRQ_GC_INIT_MASK_CACHE)
>> - gc->mask_cache = irq_reg_readl(gc->reg_base + ct->regs.mask);
>> + *gc->pmask_cache = irq_reg_readl(gc->reg_base + ct->regs.mask);
>>
>> for (i = gc->irq_base; msk; msk >>= 1, i++) {
>> if (!(msk & 0x01))
>> @@ -275,6 +278,8 @@ int irq_setup_alt_chip(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
>> struct irq_chip_type *ct = gc->chip_types;
>> unsigned int i;
>>
>> + /* Setup pointer to the mask_cache */
>> + gc->pmask_cache = &ct->mask_cache;
>
> You also need to check the flag here, to know if you need to switch
> pmask_cache on ct->mask_cache.
>
yes. I'll fix this in v2.
>> for (i = 0; i < gc->num_ct; i++, ct++) {
>> if (ct->type & type) {
>> d->chip = &ct->chip;
>
> Additionally, you need to update drivers/gpio/gpio-mvebu.c which use
> gc->mask_cache. The gpio-mvebu driver is also impacted by the bug.
>
I have no chance to test this, so couldn't you or someone else do this on top of
my changes?
Thanks,
Holger
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-15 10:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-14 16:10 [PATCH] genirq: allow an alternative setup for the mask cache Holger Brunck
2013-03-14 17:45 ` Simon Guinot
2013-03-15 10:43 ` Holger Brunck [this message]
2013-03-15 11:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-15 16:26 ` Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-15 19:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-14 19:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-14 19:42 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-03-18 11:05 ` Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-15 19:36 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] refactoring for mask_cache Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-15 19:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] genirq: cosmetic: remove cur_regs Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-15 19:36 ` [PATCH 2/2] genirq: move mask_cache into struct irq_chip_type Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-15 20:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-18 7:59 ` Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-18 8:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-15 21:25 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] refactoring for mask_cache Andrew Lunn
2013-03-15 23:34 ` Simon Guinot
2013-03-18 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] " Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-18 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] genirq: cosmetic: remove cur_regs Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-18 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] genirq: add mask_cache and pmask_cache into struct irq_chip_type Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-19 11:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-18 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] gpio: mvebu: convert to usage of *pmask_cache within irq_chip_type Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-18 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] MIPS: JZ4740: " Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-18 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] ARM: SAMSUNG: " Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-18 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] genirq: rename mask_cache to shared_mask_cache Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-18 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] genirq: handle separate mask registers Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-18 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] orion-gpio: enable IRQ_GC_SEPARATE_MASK_REGISTERS Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-18 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] gpio: mvebu: " Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] refactoring for mask_cache Simon Guinot
2013-03-18 14:39 ` Simon Guinot
2013-03-19 10:03 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-03-19 10:09 ` Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-19 11:25 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-03-19 11:06 ` Jason Cooper
2013-03-19 11:10 ` Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-19 11:44 ` Jason Cooper
2013-03-19 11:56 ` Jason Cooper
2013-03-20 17:40 ` Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-20 21:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-21 10:37 ` Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-21 10:59 ` Simon Guinot
2013-03-19 11:19 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-03-21 10:51 ` Simon Guinot
2013-03-21 11:24 ` Gerlando Falauto
2013-04-04 9:31 ` Ezequiel Garcia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5142FB46.30609@keymile.com \
--to=holger.brunck@keymile.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.