From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Hogan Subject: Re: [PATCH resend v5] fs: imgdafs: Add IMG DAFS filesystem for metag Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 14:52:57 +0000 Message-ID: <514335C9.5000501@imgtec.com> References: <1362747737-27557-1-git-send-email-james.hogan@imgtec.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: James Hogan To: , , Alexander Viro Return-path: Received: from multi.imgtec.com ([194.200.65.239]:44987 "EHLO multi.imgtec.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754703Ab3COOxB (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Mar 2013 10:53:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1362747737-27557-1-git-send-email-james.hogan@imgtec.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 08/03/13 13:02, James Hogan wrote: > Add the IMG Debug Adapter File System (DAFS) for metag, which uses > SWITCH operations to communicate with a file server on a host computer > via a JTAG debug adapter. > > Signed-off-by: James Hogan > Cc: Alexander Viro > --- > This is pretty much a resend of v4, but separated from the arch/metag > patchset. I didn't get any response beyond v1 so I excluded it from that > patchset. I'd like to get it included in v3.10. Ping. I'd like to get this accepted for v3.10, but haven't had a response to it since October. Do new file systems like this normally go through the official vfs tree or should I just take it through the metag tree? Cheers James