From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: eparis@redhat.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, rgb@redhat.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-audit@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] audit: Simplify by assuming the callers socket buffer is large enough
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 22:27:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5147229.ivUnbSCGlH@x2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140307.194801.1893514114998807038.davem@davemloft.net>
On Friday, March 07, 2014 07:48:01 PM David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
> Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 17:52:02 -0500
>
> > Audit is non-tolerant to failure and loss.
>
> Netlink is not a loss-less transport.
Perhaps. But in all our testing over the years its been very good.
-Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-08 3:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-28 18:49 [PATCH] audit: Use struct net not pid_t to remember the network namespce to reply in Eric W. Biederman
2014-02-28 18:49 ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-03-01 1:11 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-03-01 4:34 ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-03-01 4:36 ` [PATCH] audit: Send replies in the proper network namespace Eric W. Biederman
2014-03-01 4:50 ` [RFC][PATCH] audit: Simplify by assuming the callers socket buffer is large enough Eric W. Biederman
2014-03-01 4:50 ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-03-04 21:30 ` Andrew Morton
2014-03-04 21:30 ` Andrew Morton
2014-03-04 21:51 ` David Miller
2014-03-04 22:41 ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-03-04 22:50 ` Andrew Morton
2014-03-04 22:50 ` Andrew Morton
2014-03-10 3:06 ` [GIT PULL] namespaces fixes for 3.14-rcX Eric W. Biederman
2014-03-10 13:59 ` Eric Paris
2014-03-10 19:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-03-16 18:36 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-03-05 0:21 ` [RFC][PATCH] audit: Simplify by assuming the callers socket buffer is large enough David Miller
2014-03-05 16:59 ` Steve Grubb
2014-03-05 16:59 ` Steve Grubb
2014-03-05 17:57 ` LC Bruzenak
2014-03-05 18:06 ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-03-07 22:52 ` Eric Paris
2014-03-08 0:48 ` David Miller
2014-03-08 3:27 ` Steve Grubb [this message]
2014-03-08 6:34 ` David Miller
2014-03-08 6:34 ` David Miller
2014-03-08 3:56 ` Eric Paris
2014-03-10 19:30 ` David Miller
2014-03-10 21:57 ` Eric Paris
2014-03-10 21:57 ` Eric Paris
2014-03-16 18:19 ` [PATCH] audit: Send replies in the proper network namespace Richard Guy Briggs
2014-03-16 19:13 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-03-16 18:15 ` [PATCH] audit: Use struct net not pid_t to remember the network namespce to reply in Richard Guy Briggs
2014-03-16 19:12 ` Richard Guy Briggs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5147229.ivUnbSCGlH@x2 \
--to=sgrubb@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rgb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.